Previously we considered R_ARM_V4BX to be an absolute relocation,
which meant that we rejected it in read-only sections in PIC output
files. Instead, treat it as a hint relocation so that relocation
processing ignores it entirely.
Also fix a problem with the test case where it was never being run
because it has a .yaml extension and we don't run tests with that
extension.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55728
llvm-svn: 349216
return R_NONE;
case R_ARM_TLS_LE32:
return R_TLS;
+ case R_ARM_V4BX:
+ // V4BX is just a marker to indicate there's a "bx rN" instruction at the
+ // given address. It can be used to implement a special linker mode which
+ // rewrites ARMv4T inputs to ARMv4. Since we support only ARMv4 input and
+ // not ARMv4 output, we can just ignore it.
+ return R_HINT;
default:
return R_ABS;
}
((Val << 4) & 0x7000) | // imm3
(Val & 0x00ff)); // imm8
break;
- case R_ARM_V4BX:
- // V4BX is just a marker to indicate there's a "bx rN" instruction at the
- // given address. It can be used to implement a special linker mode which
- // rewrites ARMv4T inputs to ARMv4. Since we support only ARMv4 input and
- // not ARMv4 output, we can just ignore it.
- break;
default:
error(getErrorLocation(Loc) + "unrecognized reloc " + Twine(Type));
}
# RUN: yaml2obj %s -o %t.o
# RUN: ld.lld %t.o -o %t
# RUN: llvm-readelf -sections %t | FileCheck %s
+# RUN: ld.lld -shared %t.o -o %t
+# RUN: llvm-readelf -sections %t | FileCheck %s
# CHECK: .text