When replacing KUNIT_BINARY_*_MSG_ASSERTION() macros with
KUNIT_BINARY_INT_ASSERTION(), the assert_type parameter was not always
correctly transferred. Specifically, the following errors were
introduced:
- KUNIT_EXPECT_LE_MSG() uses KUNIT_ASSERTION
- KUNIT_ASSERT_LT_MSG() uses KUNIT_EXPECTATION
- KUNIT_ASSERT_GT_MSG() uses KUNIT_EXPECTATION
A failing KUNIT_EXPECT_LE_MSG() test thus prevents further tests from
running, while failing KUNIT_ASSERT_{LT,GT}_MSG() tests do not prevent
further tests from running. This is contrary to the documentation,
which states that failing KUNIT_EXPECT_* macros allow further tests to
run, while failing KUNIT_ASSERT_* macros should prevent this.
Revert the KUNIT_{ASSERTION,EXPECTATION} switches to fix the behaviour
for the affected macros.
Fixes: 40f39777ce4f ("kunit: decrease macro layering for integer asserts")
Signed-off-by: Sander Vanheule <sander@svanheule.net>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
#define KUNIT_EXPECT_LE_MSG(test, left, right, fmt, ...) \
KUNIT_BINARY_INT_ASSERTION(test, \
- KUNIT_ASSERTION, \
+ KUNIT_EXPECTATION, \
left, <=, right, \
fmt, \
##__VA_ARGS__)
#define KUNIT_ASSERT_LT_MSG(test, left, right, fmt, ...) \
KUNIT_BINARY_INT_ASSERTION(test, \
- KUNIT_EXPECTATION, \
+ KUNIT_ASSERTION, \
left, <, right, \
fmt, \
##__VA_ARGS__)
#define KUNIT_ASSERT_GT_MSG(test, left, right, fmt, ...) \
KUNIT_BINARY_INT_ASSERTION(test, \
- KUNIT_EXPECTATION, \
+ KUNIT_ASSERTION, \
left, >, right, \
fmt, \
##__VA_ARGS__)