Avoid a sparse warning about 'ret' variable shadowing
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
/* Try to get same port: if not, try to change it. */
for (port = ntohs(exp->saved_proto.tcp.port); port != 0; port++) {
- int ret;
+ int res;
exp->tuple.dst.u.tcp.port = htons(port);
- ret = nf_ct_expect_related(exp);
- if (ret == 0)
+ res = nf_ct_expect_related(exp);
+ if (res == 0)
break;
- else if (ret != -EBUSY) {
+ else if (res != -EBUSY) {
port = 0;
break;
}