- - Probably no point in a version number in the daemon name
- (s/dbus-daemon-1/dbus-daemon/)
+Important for 1.0
+===
- How we will handle DCOP needs sorting out. Among other things, we
need to check that service and service-ownership semantics map to DCOP
- Activation needs some careful additional thinking-through.
+ - Audit @todo and FIXME for security issues
+
+ - The convenience functions in dbus-bus.h should perhaps have
+ the signatures that they would have if they were autogenerated
+ stubs. e.g. the acquire service function. We should also evaluate
+ which of these functions to include, in light of the fact that
+ GLib/Qt native stubs will probably also exist.
+
+ - the invalid messages in the test suite are all useless because
+ they are invalid for the wrong reasons due to protocol changes.
+ (Consider extending test suite to validate that they are
+ invalid for right reason, e.g. an "INVALID_ERROR Foo" line
+ in the message files)
+
+ - modify the auth protocol to also support other initial-handshake
+ type of information:
+
+ Perhaps the auth protocol should be able to negotiate a protocol
+ version to the least-common-denominator between client and server?
+ Though in practice ever using this feature would be pretty tough,
+ since protocol probably modifies the API. But we could have it there
+ as a safety net.
+
+ - re_align_field_recurse() in dbus-message.c is broken because it
+ crashes on some types of header field values. security problem.
+
+ - modify the wire protocol to keep the args signature separate
+ from the args themselves. Make the name of TYPE_CUSTOM part
+ of the type signature, rather than part of the value.
+ Then you have the full typecheck in a single string.
+ See http://freedesktop.org/pipermail/dbus/2004-June/001169.html
+
+ Subnote: STRING_OR_NIL is wrong, doesn't work in C++ etc. ; should
+ not have done that. Use empty string or special string values or separate functions/signals
+ or whatever instead.
+
+ Subnote: For recursive types, one approach is that "structs" are done as parens,
+ so e.g. s(ii) is a string and struct { int; int; } etc. Type codes
+ then all have to be done as strings not single ints.
+ We could also put the type signature for the message body in a
+ header field.
+ An "any" type has the type string included in the value.
+
+ - need to define bus behavior if you send a message to
+ yourself; is it an error, or allowed? If allowed,
+ we need to have a test for it in the test suite.
+
+ - array lengths should probably be returned as size_t rather than int
+ (though they are kind of a pita to pass in as size_t with the
+ varargs, so maybe not - what does glib do with g_object_get()?)
+
+ - finish dbus-glib-tool support for adding introspection
+ data to GObject and autoexporting GObject using same
+
+ - the GLib bindings varargs take DBUS_TYPE_WHATEVER and
+ return stuff allocated with dbus_malloc(); should this
+ be made more "G" at some expense in code duplication?
+ You also still have to use some D-BUS functions such as
+ dbus_message_get_args() which takes a DBusError.
+ Probably we need to either fully encapsulate and hide
+ dbus/dbus.h, or encapsulate it slightly less e.g. no
+ GError. Or maybe it's as simple as "never return dbus_malloc()
+ memory" and just fully encapsulate the get_args() type of
+ stuff.
+
+ - dbus_gproxy or dbus_g_proxy?
+
+Might as Well for 1.0
+===
+
+ - Probably no point in a version number in the daemon name
+ (s/dbus-daemon-1/dbus-daemon/)
+
+ - add dbus_message_has_path(), maybe has_member/interface
+
+ - dbus_message_iter_init_array_iterator has "iter" and "iterator"
+ in the same function name
+
+Can Be Post 1.0
+===
+
- Property list feature on message bus (list of properties associated
with a connection). May also include message matching rules
that involve the properties of the source or destination
connection.
- - Automatic service activation, should probably be done through a message flag.
-
- Disconnecting the remote end on invalid UTF-8 is probably not a good
- idea. The definitiion of "valid" is slightly fuzzy. I think it might
+ idea. The definition of "valid" is slightly fuzzy. I think it might
be better to just silently "fix" the UTF-8, or perhaps return an error.
Owen says we should only validate the UTF-8 on dbus_message_get_string()
(changing get_string to have an error return, and allowing a type error
as a possible return)
- - The convenience functions in dbus-bus.h should perhaps have
- the signatures that they would have if they were autogenerated
- stubs. e.g. the acquire service function. We should also evaluate
- which of these functions to include, in light of the fact that
- GLib/Qt native stubs will probably also exist.
-
- assorted _-prefixed symbols in libdbus aren't actually used by
libdbus, only by the message bus. These bloat up the library
size. Not sure how to fix, really.
call serial to all method calls all the time, or disallowing
async calls.
- - the invalid messages in the test suite are all useless because
- they are invalid for the wrong reasons due to protocol changes.
- (Consider extending test suite to validate that they are
- invalid for right reason, e.g. an "INVALID_ERROR Foo" line
- in the message files)
+ If done post 1.0 will probably be an optional/ugly-API type
+ of thing.
- I don't want to introduce DBusObject, but refcounting and object
data could still be factored out into an internal "base class"
perhaps.
- - modify the auth protocol to also support other initial-handshake
- type of information such as protocol version
-
- document the auth protocol as a set of states and transitions, and
then reimplement it in those terms
- - dbus_gproxy or dbus_g_proxy?
-
- - add dbus_message_has_path(), maybe has_member/interface
-
- - re_align_field_recurse() in dbus-message.c is broken because it
- crashes on some types of header field values. security problem.
-
- - modify the wire protocol to keep the args signature separate
- from the args themselves. Make the name of TYPE_CUSTOM part
- of the type signature, rather than part of the value.
- Then you have the full typecheck in a single string.
- See http://freedesktop.org/pipermail/dbus/2004-June/001169.html
-
- - dbus_message_iter_init_array_iterator has "iter" and "iterator"
- in the same function name
-
- - the GLib bindings varargs take DBUS_TYPE_WHATEVER and
- return stuff allocated with dbus_malloc(); should this
- be made more "G" at some expense in code duplication?
- You also still have to use some D-BUS functions such as
- dbus_message_get_args() which takes a DBusError.
- Probably we need to either fully encapsulate and hide
- dbus/dbus.h, or encapsulate it slightly less e.g. no
- GError. Or maybe it's as simple as "never return dbus_malloc()
- memory" and just fully encapsulate the get_args() type of
- stuff.
-
- - need to define bus behavior if you send a message to
- yourself; is it an error, or allowed? If allowed,
- we need to have a test for it in the test suite.
-
- - array lengths should probably be returned as size_t rather than int
- (though they are kind of a pita to pass in as size_t with the
- varargs, so maybe not - what does glib do with g_object_get()?)
-
- recursive dispatch, see dbus_connection_dispatch()
- - Perhaps the auth protocol should be able to negotiate a protocol
- version to the least-common-denominator between client and server?
- Though in practice ever using this feature would be pretty tough,
- since protocol probably modifies the API. But we could have it there
- as a safety net.
-
- - STRING_OR_NIL is wrong, doesn't work in C++ etc. ; should not have done that.
- Use empty string or special string values or separate functions/signals
- or whatever instead.
-
- - For recursive types, one approach is that "structs" are done as parens,
- so e.g. s(ii) is a string and struct { int; int; } etc. Type codes
- then all have to be done as strings not single ints.
- We could also put the type signature for the message body in a header field.
- An "any" type has the type string included in the value.
-
- do we need per-display activation; if so I'd like to do this by setting a
"display ID" property on screen 0, with a GUID, and keying activation by
said GUID. Otherwise you get all kinds of unrobust
to the display. If displays have a deterministic ID like this, you can
do per-display by simply including GUID in the service name.
+ - optimization and profiling!