As it is, zero msg_iovlen means that the first iovec in the kernel
array of iovecs is left uninitialized, so checking if its ->iov_base
is NULL is random. Since the real users of that thing are doing
sendto(fd, NULL, 0, ...), they are getting msg_iovlen = 1 and
msg_iov[0] = {NULL, 0}, which is what this test is trying to catch.
As suggested by davem, let's just check that msg_iovlen was 1 and
msg_iov[0].iov_base was NULL - _that_ is well-defined and it catches
what we want to catch.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
goto out;
}
+ /* It's a really convoluted way for userland to ask for mmaped
+ * sendmsg(), but that's what we've got...
+ */
if (netlink_tx_is_mmaped(sk) &&
+ msg->msg_iter.type == ITER_IOVEC &&
+ msg->msg_iter.nr_segs == 1 &&
msg->msg_iter.iov->iov_base == NULL) {
err = netlink_mmap_sendmsg(sk, msg, dst_portid, dst_group,
&scm);