There's currently a comment in the code saying function 0 is GPIO.
Instead of hardcoding it, let's add a member where an SoC can specify
it. No known SoCs use a number other than 0, but this just makes the
code clearer. NOTE: no SoC code needs to be updated since we can rely
on zero-initialization.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Maulik Shah <mkshah@codeaurora.org>
Tested-by: Maulik Shah <mkshah@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210114191601.v7.1.I3ad184e3423d8e479bc3e86f5b393abb1704a1d1@changeid
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
if (!g->nfuncs)
return 0;
- /* For now assume function 0 is GPIO because it always is */
- return msm_pinmux_set_mux(pctldev, g->funcs[0], offset);
+ return msm_pinmux_set_mux(pctldev, g->funcs[pctrl->soc->gpio_func], offset);
}
static const struct pinmux_ops msm_pinmux_ops = {
* @wakeirq_dual_edge_errata: If true then GPIOs using the wakeirq_map need
* to be aware that their parent can't handle dual
* edge interrupts.
+ * @gpio_func: Which function number is GPIO (usually 0).
*/
struct msm_pinctrl_soc_data {
const struct pinctrl_pin_desc *pins;
const struct msm_gpio_wakeirq_map *wakeirq_map;
unsigned int nwakeirq_map;
bool wakeirq_dual_edge_errata;
+ unsigned int gpio_func;
};
extern const struct dev_pm_ops msm_pinctrl_dev_pm_ops;