commit
00e158fb91dfaff3f94746f260d11f1a4853506e upstream.
When smc_close_final() returns error, the return code overwrites by
kernel_sock_shutdown() in smc_close_active(). The return code of
smc_close_final() is more important than kernel_sock_shutdown(), and it
will pass to userspace directly.
Fix it by keeping both return codes, if smc_close_final() raises an
error, return it or kernel_sock_shutdown()'s.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-s390/1f67548e-cbf6-0dce-82b5-10288a4583bd@linux.ibm.com/
Fixes:
606a63c9783a ("net/smc: Ensure the active closing peer first closes clcsock")
Suggested-by: Karsten Graul <kgraul@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lu <tonylu@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com>
Acked-by: Karsten Graul <kgraul@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
int old_state;
long timeout;
int rc = 0;
+ int rc1 = 0;
timeout = current->flags & PF_EXITING ?
0 : sock_flag(sk, SOCK_LINGER) ?
/* actively shutdown clcsock before peer close it,
* prevent peer from entering TIME_WAIT state.
*/
- if (smc->clcsock && smc->clcsock->sk)
- rc = kernel_sock_shutdown(smc->clcsock, SHUT_RDWR);
+ if (smc->clcsock && smc->clcsock->sk) {
+ rc1 = kernel_sock_shutdown(smc->clcsock,
+ SHUT_RDWR);
+ rc = rc ? rc : rc1;
+ }
} else {
/* peer event has changed the state */
goto again;