uterm: vt: fix skipping real_activate() when being inactive

This is probably a copy&paste error from real_deactivate(). We should skip
real_activate() if we are _active_, not if we are _inactive_.

Signed-off-by: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@googlemail.com>

diff --git a/src/uterm_vt.c b/src/uterm_vt.c
index 4ce4633..ec915be 100644 (file)
--- a/src/uterm_vt.c
+++ b/src/uterm_vt.c
@@ -338,7 +338,7 @@ static int real_activate(struct uterm_vt *vt)
                return -EFAULT;
        }
 
-       if (vts.v_active != vt->real_num)
+       if (vts.v_active == vt->real_num)
                return 0;
 
        ret = ioctl(vt->real_fd, VT_ACTIVATE, vt->real_num);