drm/i915: Pull intel_uncore_arm_unclaimed_mmio_detection() under the spinlock

Elsewhere we manipulate uncore.unclaimed_mmio_check and
i915_param.mmio_debug under the irq lock (e.g. preserving the current
value across a user forcewake grab), but do not protect the manipulation
inside intel_uncore_arm_unclaimed_mmio_detection() from concurrent
access, even from itself. This is an issue as we do call
arm_unclaimed_mmio_detection from multiple threads without coordination.

Suggested-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intelcom>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180904131207.17563-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
index 05f0cda..3ad302c 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
@@ -2283,8 +2283,12 @@ bool intel_uncore_unclaimed_mmio(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 bool
 intel_uncore_arm_unclaimed_mmio_detection(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 {
+       bool ret = false;
+
+       spin_lock_irq(&dev_priv->uncore.lock);
+
        if (unlikely(dev_priv->uncore.unclaimed_mmio_check <= 0))
-               return false;
+               goto out;
 
        if (unlikely(intel_uncore_unclaimed_mmio(dev_priv))) {
                if (!i915_modparams.mmio_debug) {
@@ -2294,10 +2298,13 @@ intel_uncore_arm_unclaimed_mmio_detection(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
                        i915_modparams.mmio_debug++;
                }
                dev_priv->uncore.unclaimed_mmio_check--;
-               return true;
+               ret = true;
        }
 
-       return false;
+out:
+       spin_unlock_irq(&dev_priv->uncore.lock);
+
+       return ret;
 }
 
 static enum forcewake_domains