ima: Have the LSM free its audit rule
authorTyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com>
Thu, 9 Jul 2020 06:19:00 +0000 (01:19 -0500)
committerMimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
Fri, 17 Jul 2020 01:53:55 +0000 (21:53 -0400)
Ask the LSM to free its audit rule rather than directly calling kfree().
Both AppArmor and SELinux do additional work in their audit_rule_free()
hooks. Fix memory leaks by allowing the LSMs to perform necessary work.

Fixes: b16942455193 ("ima: use the lsm policy update notifier")
Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com>
Cc: Janne Karhunen <janne.karhunen@gmail.com>
Cc: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
security/integrity/ima/ima.h
security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c

index 4515975..59ec28f 100644 (file)
@@ -420,6 +420,7 @@ static inline void ima_free_modsig(struct modsig *modsig)
 #ifdef CONFIG_IMA_LSM_RULES
 
 #define security_filter_rule_init security_audit_rule_init
+#define security_filter_rule_free security_audit_rule_free
 #define security_filter_rule_match security_audit_rule_match
 
 #else
@@ -430,6 +431,10 @@ static inline int security_filter_rule_init(u32 field, u32 op, char *rulestr,
        return -EINVAL;
 }
 
+static inline void security_filter_rule_free(void *lsmrule)
+{
+}
+
 static inline int security_filter_rule_match(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op,
                                             void *lsmrule)
 {
index 66aa3e1..d7c268c 100644 (file)
@@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ static void ima_lsm_free_rule(struct ima_rule_entry *entry)
        int i;
 
        for (i = 0; i < MAX_LSM_RULES; i++) {
-               kfree(entry->lsm[i].rule);
+               security_filter_rule_free(entry->lsm[i].rule);
                kfree(entry->lsm[i].args_p);
        }
        kfree(entry);