_pixman_run_fast_path: typo

This is one example of a compiler warning that was lost amit the build
noise.

The error here is that in a list of required conditions we used ';'
instead of '&&' with the result of continuing to use the fast-path
even if we had a wide mask.

Another error is that it was testing src, not mask as it should.

diff --git a/pixman/pixman-utils.c b/pixman/pixman-utils.c
index 961c6c67bf1fde9a5db61377ed7c7ff5bd0edc52..71282062c81a564344fc0373596de3aa49b2c6a2 100644 (file)
--- a/pixman/pixman-utils.c
+++ b/pixman/pixman-utils.c
@@ -670,15 +670,16 @@ _pixman_run_fast_path (const pixman_fast_path_t *paths,
 
     if (mask && has_fast_path)
     {
-       has_fast_path = mask->type == BITS &&
-                       !mask->common.transform &&
-                       !mask->common.alpha_map &&
-                       !mask->bits.read_func &&
-                       !mask->bits.write_func &&
-                        mask->common.filter != PIXMAN_FILTER_CONVOLUTION &&
-                        mask->common.repeat != PIXMAN_REPEAT_PAD &&
-                        mask->common.repeat != PIXMAN_REPEAT_REFLECT;
-                       !PIXMAN_FORMAT_IS_WIDE (src->bits.format);
+       has_fast_path =
+           mask->type == BITS &&
+           !mask->common.transform &&
+           !mask->common.alpha_map &&
+           !mask->bits.read_func &&
+           !mask->bits.write_func &&
+           mask->common.filter != PIXMAN_FILTER_CONVOLUTION &&
+           mask->common.repeat != PIXMAN_REPEAT_PAD &&
+           mask->common.repeat != PIXMAN_REPEAT_REFLECT &&
+           !PIXMAN_FORMAT_IS_WIDE (mask->bits.format);
     }
 
     if (has_fast_path)