The PLL_LOCKDET_RATE_1 was being programmed with a hardcoded value
directly, but the same value was also being specified in the
dsi_pll_regs struct pll_lockdet_rate variable: let's use it!
Based on
362cadf34b9f ("drm/msm/dsi_pll_10nm: Fix variable usage for
pll_lockdet_rate")
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Abhinav Kumar <abhinavk@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
pll_write(base + REG_DSI_7nm_PHY_PLL_FRAC_DIV_START_LOW_1, reg->frac_div_start_low);
pll_write(base + REG_DSI_7nm_PHY_PLL_FRAC_DIV_START_MID_1, reg->frac_div_start_mid);
pll_write(base + REG_DSI_7nm_PHY_PLL_FRAC_DIV_START_HIGH_1, reg->frac_div_start_high);
- pll_write(base + REG_DSI_7nm_PHY_PLL_PLL_LOCKDET_RATE_1, 0x40);
+ pll_write(base + REG_DSI_7nm_PHY_PLL_PLL_LOCKDET_RATE_1, reg->pll_lockdet_rate);
pll_write(base + REG_DSI_7nm_PHY_PLL_PLL_LOCK_DELAY, 0x06);
pll_write(base + REG_DSI_7nm_PHY_PLL_CMODE_1, 0x10); /* TODO: 0x00 for CPHY */
pll_write(base + REG_DSI_7nm_PHY_PLL_CLOCK_INVERTERS, reg->pll_clock_inverters);