[IA64] Fix wrong use of memparse in efi.c
authorZou Nan hai <nanhai.zou@intel.com>
Tue, 7 Feb 2006 03:35:46 +0000 (11:35 +0800)
committerTony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Tue, 7 Feb 2006 22:13:09 +0000 (14:13 -0800)
The check of (end != cp) after memparse in efi.c looks wrong to me.
The result is that we can't use mem= and max_addr= kernel parameter at
the same time.

The following patch removed the check just like other arches do.

Signed-off-by: Zou Nan hai <nanhai.zou@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
arch/ia64/kernel/efi.c

index d51c2f2..9990320 100644 (file)
@@ -410,24 +410,16 @@ efi_init (void)
        efi_config_table_t *config_tables;
        efi_char16_t *c16;
        u64 efi_desc_size;
-       char *cp, *end, vendor[100] = "unknown";
+       char *cp, vendor[100] = "unknown";
        extern char saved_command_line[];
        int i;
 
        /* it's too early to be able to use the standard kernel command line support... */
        for (cp = saved_command_line; *cp; ) {
                if (memcmp(cp, "mem=", 4) == 0) {
-                       cp += 4;
-                       mem_limit = memparse(cp, &end);
-                       if (end != cp)
-                               break;
-                       cp = end;
+                       mem_limit = memparse(cp + 4, &cp);
                } else if (memcmp(cp, "max_addr=", 9) == 0) {
-                       cp += 9;
-                       max_addr = GRANULEROUNDDOWN(memparse(cp, &end));
-                       if (end != cp)
-                               break;
-                       cp = end;
+                       max_addr = GRANULEROUNDDOWN(memparse(cp + 9, &cp));
                } else {
                        while (*cp != ' ' && *cp)
                                ++cp;