commit
c675949ec58ca50d5a3ae3c757892f1560f6e896
Author: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Date: Wed Apr 9 11:31:37 2014 +0300
drm/i915: do not setup backlight if not available according to VBT
caused a regression on machines with a misconfigured VBT. Add a quirk to
assert the presence of a controllable backlight. Use it to ignore the VBT
backlight presence check during backlight setup.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79813
Tested-by: James Duley <jagduley@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Michael Mullin <masmullin@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Scot Doyle <lkml14@scotdoyle.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.15 only
[danvet: Add cc: stable because the regressing commit is in 3.15.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
#define QUIRK_PIPEA_FORCE (1<<0)
#define QUIRK_LVDS_SSC_DISABLE (1<<1)
#define QUIRK_INVERT_BRIGHTNESS (1<<2)
+#define QUIRK_BACKLIGHT_PRESENT (1<<3)
struct intel_fbdev;
struct intel_fbc_work;
DRM_INFO("applying inverted panel brightness quirk\n");
}
+/* Some VBT's incorrectly indicate no backlight is present */
+static void quirk_backlight_present(struct drm_device *dev)
+{
+ struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
+ dev_priv->quirks |= QUIRK_BACKLIGHT_PRESENT;
+ DRM_INFO("applying backlight present quirk\n");
+}
+
struct intel_quirk {
int device;
int subsystem_vendor;
int ret;
if (!dev_priv->vbt.backlight.present) {
- DRM_DEBUG_KMS("native backlight control not available per VBT\n");
- return 0;
+ if (dev_priv->quirks & QUIRK_BACKLIGHT_PRESENT) {
+ DRM_DEBUG_KMS("no backlight present per VBT, but present per quirk\n");
+ } else {
+ DRM_DEBUG_KMS("no backlight present per VBT\n");
+ return 0;
+ }
}
/* set level and max in panel struct */