mm/vmalloc: fix a comment
authorYixuan Cao <caoyixuan2019@email.szu.edu.cn>
Fri, 29 Apr 2022 06:16:00 +0000 (23:16 -0700)
committerakpm <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Fri, 29 Apr 2022 06:16:00 +0000 (23:16 -0700)
The sentence
"but the mempolcy want to alloc memory by interleaving"
should be rephrased with
"but the mempolicy wants to alloc memory by interleaving"
where "mempolicy" is a struct name.

This work is coauthored by
Yinan Zhang
Jiajian Ye
Shenghong Han
Chongxi Zhao
Yuhong Feng
Yongqiang Liu

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220401064543.4447-1-caoyixuan2019@email.szu.edu.cn
Signed-off-by: Yixuan Cao <caoyixuan2019@email.szu.edu.cn>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
mm/vmalloc.c

index cadfbb5..9d68ac5 100644 (file)
@@ -2895,7 +2895,7 @@ vm_area_alloc_pages(gfp_t gfp, int nid,
                        /* memory allocation should consider mempolicy, we can't
                         * wrongly use nearest node when nid == NUMA_NO_NODE,
                         * otherwise memory may be allocated in only one node,
-                        * but mempolcy want to alloc memory by interleaving.
+                        * but mempolicy wants to alloc memory by interleaving.
                         */
                        if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA) && nid == NUMA_NO_NODE)
                                nr = alloc_pages_bulk_array_mempolicy(bulk_gfp,