Documentation related to cpus and related_cpus is confusing and not very clear.
Over that CPUFreq core has seen much changes recently. Lets update documentation
and comments for cpus and related_cpus.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
For setting some of these values, the frequency table helpers might be
helpful. See the section 2 for more information on them.
+SMP systems normally have same clock source for a group of cpus. For these the
+.init() would be called only once for the first online cpu. Here the .init()
+routine must initialize policy->cpus with mask of all possible cpus (Online +
+Offline) that share the clock. Then the core would copy this mask onto
+policy->related_cpus and will reset policy->cpus to carry only online cpus.
+
1.3 verify
------------
first set scaling_max_freq, then
scaling_min_freq.
-affected_cpus : List of CPUs that require software coordination
- of frequency.
+affected_cpus : List of Online CPUs that require software
+ coordination of frequency.
-related_cpus : List of CPUs that need some sort of frequency
- coordination, whether software or hardware.
+related_cpus : List of Online + Offline CPUs that need software
+ coordination of frequency.
scaling_driver : Hardware driver for cpufreq.
};
struct cpufreq_policy {
- cpumask_var_t cpus; /* CPUs requiring sw coordination */
- cpumask_var_t related_cpus; /* CPUs with any coordination */
+ /* CPUs sharing clock, require sw coordination */
+ cpumask_var_t cpus; /* Online CPUs only */
+ cpumask_var_t related_cpus; /* Online + Offline CPUs */
+
unsigned int shared_type; /* ANY or ALL affected CPUs
should set cpufreq */
unsigned int cpu; /* cpu nr of CPU managing this policy */