The strlen() function returns a size_t which is an unsigned int on 32-bit
arches and an unsigned long on 64-bit arches. But in the drm_copy_field()
function, the strlen() return value is assigned to an 'int len' variable.
Later, the len variable is passed as copy_from_user() third argument that
is an unsigned long parameter as well.
In theory, this can lead to an integer overflow via type conversion. Since
the assignment happens to a signed int lvalue instead of a size_t lvalue.
In practice though, that's unlikely since the values copied are set by DRM
drivers and not controlled by userspace. But using a size_t for len is the
correct thing to do anyways.
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220705100215.572498-2-javierm@redhat.com
*/
static int drm_copy_field(char __user *buf, size_t *buf_len, const char *value)
{
- int len;
+ size_t len;
/* don't overflow userbuf */
len = strlen(value);