X87: fix the bug which is introduced by R24169.

    Two more DeoptimizeIf(...) are added so the branch distance changed.
    we need to use Label::kFar.

BUG=
R=weiliang.lin@intel.com

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/598353002

Patch from Chunyang Dai <chunyang.dai@intel.com>.

git-svn-id: https://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@24226 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00

diff --git a/src/x87/lithium-codegen-x87.cc b/src/x87/lithium-codegen-x87.cc
index 95a12b3..8f17258 100644 (file)
--- a/src/x87/lithium-codegen-x87.cc
+++ b/src/x87/lithium-codegen-x87.cc
@@ -5305,7 +5305,7 @@ void LCodeGen::DoDoubleToI(LDoubleToI* instr) {
     Label::Distance dist = DeoptEveryNTimes() ? Label::kFar : Label::kNear;
     __ X87TOSToI(result_reg, instr->hydrogen()->GetMinusZeroMode(),
                  &lost_precision, &is_nan, &minus_zero, dist);
-    __ jmp(&done, dist);
+    __ jmp(&done);
     __ bind(&lost_precision);
     DeoptimizeIf(no_condition, instr, "lost precision");
     __ bind(&is_nan);
@@ -5330,7 +5330,7 @@ void LCodeGen::DoDoubleToSmi(LDoubleToSmi* instr) {
   Label::Distance dist = DeoptEveryNTimes() ? Label::kFar : Label::kNear;
   __ X87TOSToI(result_reg, instr->hydrogen()->GetMinusZeroMode(),
                &lost_precision, &is_nan, &minus_zero, dist);
-  __ jmp(&done, dist);
+  __ jmp(&done);
   __ bind(&lost_precision);
   DeoptimizeIf(no_condition, instr, "lost precision");
   __ bind(&is_nan);