This fixes a mistake done with r8-5008 when introducing
allow_peel to the unroll code. The intent was to allow
peeling that doesn't grow code but the result was that
with -O3 and UL_ALL this wasn't done. The following
instantiates the desired effect by adjusting ul to UL_NO_GROWTH
if peeling is not allowed.
2022-01-05 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
PR tree-optimization/100359
* tree-ssa-loop-ivcanon.c (try_unroll_loop_completely):
Allow non-growing peeling with !allow_peel and UL_ALL.
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr100359.c: New testcase.
--- /dev/null
+/* { dg-do link } */
+/* { dg-options "-O3 -fdump-tree-cunrolli-optimized" } */
+
+extern void foo(void);
+static int b, f, *a = &b;
+int **c = &a;
+static void d() {
+ int g, h;
+ for (f = 0; f < 1; f++) {
+ int *i = &b;
+ {
+ int *j[3], **k = &a;
+ for (g = 0; g < 3; g++)
+ for (h = 0; h < 1; h++)
+ j[g] = &b;
+ *k = j[0];
+ }
+ *c = i;
+ }
+}
+int main() {
+ d();
+ *a = 0;
+ if (**c)
+ foo();
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/* Verify that we unroll the inner loop early even with -O3. */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "loop with 1 iterations completely unrolled" "cunrolli" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "loop with 3 iterations completely unrolled" "cunrolli" } } */
exit = NULL;
/* See if we can improve our estimate by using recorded loop bounds. */
- if ((allow_peel || maxiter == 0 || ul == UL_NO_GROWTH)
+ if ((maxiter == 0 || ul != UL_SINGLE_ITER)
&& maxiter >= 0
&& (!n_unroll_found || (unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT)maxiter < n_unroll))
{
/* Loop terminates before the IV variable test, so we cannot
remove it in the last iteration. */
edge_to_cancel = NULL;
+ /* If we do not allow peeling and we iterate just allow cases
+ that do not grow code. */
+ if (!allow_peel && maxiter != 0)
+ ul = UL_NO_GROWTH;
}
if (!n_unroll_found)