I missed a spot when adding the "#if __BYTE_ORDER__ == ..." guards to
the new test case for PR tree-optimization/103345. Committed as obvious.
2021-11-30 Roger Sayle <roger@nextmovesoftware.com>
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
PR testsuite/103477
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr103345.c: Correct xor test for big-endian.
((uint32_t)ptr[2] << 16) ^
((uint32_t)ptr[3] << 24);
#else
- return ((uint32_t)ptr[0]) ^
- ((uint32_t)ptr[1] << 8) ^
- ((uint32_t)ptr[2] << 16) ^
- ((uint32_t)ptr[3] << 24);
+ return ((uint32_t)ptr[3]) ^
+ ((uint32_t)ptr[2] << 8) ^
+ ((uint32_t)ptr[1] << 16) ^
+ ((uint32_t)ptr[0] << 24);
#endif
}