I'm not really sure what the idea behind the sel_div function is, but it's
useless. Since a and b are both unsigned, it's impossible for a % b < 0.
That means that part of the function never does anything. Thus it's just a
normal /. Just do that instead. I don't even understand what that operation
was supposed to mean in the signed case however....
If it was signed:
sel_div(-2, 4) == ((-2 / 4) - ((-2 % 4) < 0))
((0) - ((-2) < 0))
((0) - (1))
(-1)
What actually happens:
sel_div(-2, 4) == ((
18446744073709551614 / 4) - ((
18446744073709551614 % 4) < 0))
((
4611686018427387903) - ((2 < 0))
(
4611686018427387903 - 0)
((unsigned int)
4611686018427387903)
(
4294967295)
Neither makes a whole ton of sense to me. So I'm getting rid of the
function entirely.
Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
return 0;
}
-static inline unsigned int sel_div(unsigned long a, unsigned long b)
-{
- return a / b - (a % b < 0);
-}
-
static inline unsigned long sel_class_to_ino(u16 class)
{
return (class * (SEL_VEC_MAX + 1)) | SEL_CLASS_INO_OFFSET;
static inline u16 sel_ino_to_class(unsigned long ino)
{
- return sel_div(ino & SEL_INO_MASK, SEL_VEC_MAX + 1);
+ return (ino & SEL_INO_MASK) / (SEL_VEC_MAX + 1);
}
static inline unsigned long sel_perm_to_ino(u16 class, u32 perm)