2009-09-28 Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>

	* i386-tdep.c (i386_process_record): Remove "0x" that
	don't need.

diff --git a/gdb/ChangeLog b/gdb/ChangeLog
index be6239f..f687669 100644 (file)
--- a/gdb/ChangeLog
+++ b/gdb/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2009-09-28  Hui Zhu  <teawater@gmail.com>
+
+       * i386-tdep.c (i386_process_record): Remove "0x" that
+       don't need.
+
 2009-09-27  Ulrich Weigand  <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
 
        * s390-tdep.c (op_bctr, op_bctgr, op_bct, op1_bctg, op2_bctg,

diff --git a/gdb/i386-tdep.c b/gdb/i386-tdep.c
index ab628c4..b79bcd2 100644 (file)
--- a/gdb/i386-tdep.c
+++ b/gdb/i386-tdep.c
@@ -4043,7 +4043,7 @@ reswitch:
       if (ir.override >= 0)
         {
          warning (_("Process record ignores the memory change "
-                     "of instruction at address 0x%s because "
+                     "of instruction at address %s because "
                      "it can't get the value of the segment "
                      "register."),
                    paddress (gdbarch, ir.orig_addr));
@@ -4468,7 +4468,7 @@ reswitch:
             {
               /* addr += ((uint32_t) read_register (I386_ES_REGNUM)) << 4; */
               warning (_("Process record ignores the memory "
-                         "change of instruction at address 0x%s "
+                         "change of instruction at address %s "
                          "because it can't get the value of the "
                          "ES segment register."),
                        paddress (gdbarch, ir.orig_addr));