drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Fix drm_dp_remove_payload() invocation
authorLyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Tue, 13 Jun 2023 21:05:28 +0000 (17:05 -0400)
committerLyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Fri, 23 Jun 2023 20:13:43 +0000 (16:13 -0400)
We changed the semantics for this in:

commit e761cc20946a ("drm/display/dp_mst: Handle old/new payload states in
drm_dp_remove_payload()")

But I totally forgot to update this properly in nouveau. So, let's do that.

Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230613210529.552098-1-lyude@redhat.com
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c

index 5bb777f..1637e08 100644 (file)
@@ -909,15 +909,19 @@ nv50_msto_prepare(struct drm_atomic_state *state,
        struct nouveau_drm *drm = nouveau_drm(msto->encoder.dev);
        struct nv50_mstc *mstc = msto->mstc;
        struct nv50_mstm *mstm = mstc->mstm;
-       struct drm_dp_mst_atomic_payload *payload;
+       struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state *old_mst_state;
+       struct drm_dp_mst_atomic_payload *payload, *old_payload;
 
        NV_ATOMIC(drm, "%s: msto prepare\n", msto->encoder.name);
 
+       old_mst_state = drm_atomic_get_old_mst_topology_state(state, mgr);
+
        payload = drm_atomic_get_mst_payload_state(mst_state, mstc->port);
+       old_payload = drm_atomic_get_mst_payload_state(old_mst_state, mstc->port);
 
        // TODO: Figure out if we want to do a better job of handling VCPI allocation failures here?
        if (msto->disabled) {
-               drm_dp_remove_payload(mgr, mst_state, payload, payload);
+               drm_dp_remove_payload(mgr, mst_state, old_payload, payload);
 
                nvif_outp_dp_mst_vcpi(&mstm->outp->outp, msto->head->base.index, 0, 0, 0, 0);
        } else {