+Mon Dec 17 14:21:21 2001 Jeffrey A Law (law@redhat.com)
+
+ * expmed.c (emit_store_flag): Extract updated comparison code
+ from the return value of compare_from_rtx.
+ * expr.c (do_store_flag): Similarly.
+
2001-12-17 Nick Clifton <nickc@cambridge.redhat.com>
* caller-save.c (init_caller_save): Use MODE_BASE_REG_CLASS in
: normalizep == -1 ? constm1_rtx
: const_true_rtx);
- /* If the code of COMPARISON doesn't match CODE, something is
- wrong; we can no longer be sure that we have the operation.
- We could handle this case, but it should not happen. */
+ /* The code of COMPARISON may not match CODE if compare_from_rtx
+ decided to swap its operands and reverse the original code.
- if (GET_CODE (comparison) != code)
- abort ();
+ We know that compare_from_rtx returns either a CONST_INT or
+ a new comparison code, so it is safe to just extract the
+ code from COMPARISON. */
+ code = GET_CODE (comparison);
/* Get a reference to the target in the proper mode for this insn. */
compare_mode = insn_data[(int) icode].operand[0].mode;
|| (result != const0_rtx && invert))
? const0_rtx : const1_rtx);
+ /* The code of RESULT may not match CODE if compare_from_rtx
+ decided to swap its operands and reverse the original code.
+
+ We know that compare_from_rtx returns either a CONST_INT or
+ a new comparison code, so it is safe to just extract the
+ code from RESULT. */
+ code = GET_CODE (result);
+
label = gen_label_rtx ();
if (bcc_gen_fctn[(int) code] == 0)
abort ();