workqueue: simplify CPU hotplug code
authorTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Tue, 17 Jul 2012 19:39:28 +0000 (12:39 -0700)
committerTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Tue, 17 Jul 2012 19:39:28 +0000 (12:39 -0700)
With trustee gone, CPU hotplug code can be simplified.

* gcwq_claim/release_management() now grab and release gcwq lock too
  respectively and gained _and_lock and _and_unlock postfixes.

* All CPU hotplug logic was implemented in workqueue_cpu_callback()
  which was called by workqueue_cpu_up/down_callback() for the correct
  priority.  This was because up and down paths shared a lot of logic,
  which is no longer true.  Remove workqueue_cpu_callback() and move
  all hotplug logic into the two actual callbacks.

This patch doesn't make any functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
kernel/workqueue.c

index d1545da..471996a 100644 (file)
@@ -3358,19 +3358,21 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(work_busy);
  */
 
 /* claim manager positions of all pools */
-static void gcwq_claim_management(struct global_cwq *gcwq)
+static void gcwq_claim_management_and_lock(struct global_cwq *gcwq)
 {
        struct worker_pool *pool;
 
        for_each_worker_pool(pool, gcwq)
                mutex_lock_nested(&pool->manager_mutex, pool - gcwq->pools);
+       spin_lock_irq(&gcwq->lock);
 }
 
 /* release manager positions */
-static void gcwq_release_management(struct global_cwq *gcwq)
+static void gcwq_release_management_and_unlock(struct global_cwq *gcwq)
 {
        struct worker_pool *pool;
 
+       spin_unlock_irq(&gcwq->lock);
        for_each_worker_pool(pool, gcwq)
                mutex_unlock(&pool->manager_mutex);
 }
@@ -3385,8 +3387,7 @@ static void gcwq_unbind_fn(struct work_struct *work)
 
        BUG_ON(gcwq->cpu != smp_processor_id());
 
-       gcwq_claim_management(gcwq);
-       spin_lock_irq(&gcwq->lock);
+       gcwq_claim_management_and_lock(gcwq);
 
        /*
         * We've claimed all manager positions.  Make all workers unbound
@@ -3403,8 +3404,7 @@ static void gcwq_unbind_fn(struct work_struct *work)
 
        gcwq->flags |= GCWQ_DISASSOCIATED;
 
-       spin_unlock_irq(&gcwq->lock);
-       gcwq_release_management(gcwq);
+       gcwq_release_management_and_unlock(gcwq);
 
        /*
         * Call schedule() so that we cross rq->lock and thus can guarantee
@@ -3428,26 +3428,19 @@ static void gcwq_unbind_fn(struct work_struct *work)
                atomic_set(get_pool_nr_running(pool), 0);
 }
 
-static int __devinit workqueue_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
-                                               unsigned long action,
-                                               void *hcpu)
+/*
+ * Workqueues should be brought up before normal priority CPU notifiers.
+ * This will be registered high priority CPU notifier.
+ */
+static int __devinit workqueue_cpu_up_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
+                                              unsigned long action,
+                                              void *hcpu)
 {
        unsigned int cpu = (unsigned long)hcpu;
        struct global_cwq *gcwq = get_gcwq(cpu);
        struct worker_pool *pool;
-       struct work_struct unbind_work;
-       unsigned long flags;
-
-       action &= ~CPU_TASKS_FROZEN;
-
-       switch (action) {
-       case CPU_DOWN_PREPARE:
-               /* unbinding should happen on the local CPU */
-               INIT_WORK_ONSTACK(&unbind_work, gcwq_unbind_fn);
-               schedule_work_on(cpu, &unbind_work);
-               flush_work(&unbind_work);
-               break;
 
+       switch (action & ~CPU_TASKS_FROZEN) {
        case CPU_UP_PREPARE:
                for_each_worker_pool(pool, gcwq) {
                        struct worker *worker;
@@ -3463,45 +3456,16 @@ static int __devinit workqueue_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
                        start_worker(worker);
                        spin_unlock_irq(&gcwq->lock);
                }
-       }
-
-       /* some are called w/ irq disabled, don't disturb irq status */
-       spin_lock_irqsave(&gcwq->lock, flags);
+               break;
 
-       switch (action) {
        case CPU_DOWN_FAILED:
        case CPU_ONLINE:
-               spin_unlock_irq(&gcwq->lock);
-               gcwq_claim_management(gcwq);
-               spin_lock_irq(&gcwq->lock);
-
+               gcwq_claim_management_and_lock(gcwq);
                gcwq->flags &= ~GCWQ_DISASSOCIATED;
-
                rebind_workers(gcwq);
-
-               gcwq_release_management(gcwq);
+               gcwq_release_management_and_unlock(gcwq);
                break;
        }
-
-       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gcwq->lock, flags);
-
-       return notifier_from_errno(0);
-}
-
-/*
- * Workqueues should be brought up before normal priority CPU notifiers.
- * This will be registered high priority CPU notifier.
- */
-static int __devinit workqueue_cpu_up_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
-                                              unsigned long action,
-                                              void *hcpu)
-{
-       switch (action & ~CPU_TASKS_FROZEN) {
-       case CPU_UP_PREPARE:
-       case CPU_DOWN_FAILED:
-       case CPU_ONLINE:
-               return workqueue_cpu_callback(nfb, action, hcpu);
-       }
        return NOTIFY_OK;
 }
 
@@ -3513,9 +3477,16 @@ static int __devinit workqueue_cpu_down_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
                                                 unsigned long action,
                                                 void *hcpu)
 {
+       unsigned int cpu = (unsigned long)hcpu;
+       struct work_struct unbind_work;
+
        switch (action & ~CPU_TASKS_FROZEN) {
        case CPU_DOWN_PREPARE:
-               return workqueue_cpu_callback(nfb, action, hcpu);
+               /* unbinding should happen on the local CPU */
+               INIT_WORK_ONSTACK(&unbind_work, gcwq_unbind_fn);
+               schedule_work_on(cpu, &unbind_work);
+               flush_work(&unbind_work);
+               break;
        }
        return NOTIFY_OK;
 }