|| INSN_CODE (rinsn) == CODE_FOR_vlmax_avldi);
}
+/* Return true if the block is a loop itself:
+ local_dem
+ __________
+ ____|____ |
+ | | |
+ |________| |
+ |_________|
+ reaching_out
+*/
static bool
loop_basic_block_p (const basic_block cfg_bb)
{
- return JUMP_P (BB_END (cfg_bb)) && any_condjump_p (BB_END (cfg_bb));
+ if (JUMP_P (BB_END (cfg_bb)) && any_condjump_p (BB_END (cfg_bb)))
+ {
+ edge e;
+ edge_iterator ei;
+ FOR_EACH_EDGE (e, ei, cfg_bb->succs)
+ if (e->dest->index == cfg_bb->index)
+ return true;
+ }
+ return false;
}
/* Return true if it is an RVV instruction depends on VTYPE global
{
if (loop_basic_block_p (cfg_bb))
{
- if (block_info.local_dem.compatible_p (block_info.reaching_out))
- return true;
-
- /* There is a obvious case that is not worthwhile and meaningless
- to propagate the demand information:
- local_dem
- __________
- ____|____ |
- | | |
- |________| |
- |_________|
- reaching_out
- Header is incompatible with reaching_out and the block is loop itself,
- we don't backward propagate the local_dem since we can't avoid emit
- vsetvl for the local_dem. */
- edge e;
- edge_iterator ei;
- FOR_EACH_EDGE (e, ei, cfg_bb->succs)
- if (e->dest->index == cfg_bb->index)
+ if (block_info.reaching_out.valid_or_dirty_p ())
+ {
+ if (block_info.local_dem.compatible_p (block_info.reaching_out))
+ {
+ /* Case 1 (Can backward propagate):
+ ....
+ bb0:
+ ...
+ for (int i = 0; i < n; i++)
+ {
+ vint16mf4_t v = __riscv_vle16_v_i16mf4 (in + i + 5, 7);
+ __riscv_vse16_v_i16mf4 (out + i + 5, v, 7);
+ }
+ The local_dem is compatible with reaching_out. Such case is
+ worthwhile backward propagation. */
+ return true;
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ /* Case 2 (Don't backward propagate):
+ ....
+ bb0:
+ ...
+ for (int i = 0; i < n; i++)
+ {
+ vint16mf4_t v = __riscv_vle16_v_i16mf4 (in + i + 5, 7);
+ __riscv_vse16_v_i16mf4 (out + i + 5, v, 7);
+ vint16mf2_t v2 = __riscv_vle16_v_i16mf2 (in + i + 6, 8);
+ __riscv_vse16_v_i16mf2 (out + i + 6, v, 8);
+ }
+ The local_dem is incompatible with reaching_out.
+ It makes no sense to backward propagate the local_dem since we
+ can't avoid VSETVL inside the loop. */
+ return false;
+ }
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ gcc_assert (block_info.reaching_out.unknown_p ());
+ /* Case 3 (Don't backward propagate):
+ ....
+ bb0:
+ ...
+ for (int i = 0; i < n; i++)
+ {
+ vint16mf4_t v = __riscv_vle16_v_i16mf4 (in + i + 5, 7);
+ __riscv_vse16_v_i16mf4 (out + i + 5, v, 7);
+ fn3 ();
+ }
+ The local_dem is VALID, but the reaching_out is UNKNOWN.
+ It makes no sense to backward propagate the local_dem since we
+ can't avoid VSETVL inside the loop. */
return false;
+ }
}
return true;