is a good approximation for that cost. However, most RISC machines have
only a few (usually only one) memory reference formats. If an address is
valid at all, it is often just as cheap as any other address. Hence, for
- RISC machines, we use the configuration macro `ADDRESS_COST' to compare the
- costs of various addresses. For two addresses of equal cost, choose the one
- with the highest `rtx_cost' value as that has the potential of eliminating
- the most insns. For equal costs, we choose the first in the equivalence
- class. Note that we ignore the fact that pseudo registers are cheaper
- than hard registers here because we would also prefer the pseudo registers.
- */
+ RISC machines, we use `address_cost' to compare the costs of various
+ addresses. For two addresses of equal cost, choose the one with the
+ highest `rtx_cost' value as that has the potential of eliminating the
+ most insns. For equal costs, we choose the first in the equivalence
+ class. Note that we ignore the fact that pseudo registers are cheaper than
+ hard registers here because we would also prefer the pseudo registers. */
static void
find_best_addr (insn, loc, mode)
{
struct table_elt *elt;
rtx addr = *loc;
-#ifdef ADDRESS_COST
struct table_elt *p;
int found_better = 1;
-#endif
int save_do_not_record = do_not_record;
int save_hash_arg_in_memory = hash_arg_in_memory;
int addr_volatile;
elt = lookup (addr, hash, Pmode);
-#ifndef ADDRESS_COST
- if (elt)
- {
- int our_cost = elt->cost;
-
- /* Find the lowest cost below ours that works. */
- for (elt = elt->first_same_value; elt; elt = elt->next_same_value)
- if (elt->cost < our_cost
- && (GET_CODE (elt->exp) == REG
- || exp_equiv_p (elt->exp, elt->exp, 1, 0))
- && validate_change (insn, loc,
- canon_reg (copy_rtx (elt->exp), NULL_RTX), 0))
- return;
- }
-#else
-
if (elt)
{
/* We need to find the best (under the criteria documented above) entry
}
}
}
-#endif
}
\f
/* Given an operation (CODE, *PARG1, *PARG2), where code is a comparison