Checkpatch complains that 'return EINVAL' is usually wrong
(since we tend to favor 'return -EINVAL'). But it is a
false positive for nbd_errno_to_system_errno(). Since NBD
may add future defined wire values, refactor the code to
keep checkpatch happy.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <
1476469998-28592-14-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
static int nbd_errno_to_system_errno(int err)
{
+ int ret;
switch (err) {
case NBD_SUCCESS:
- return 0;
+ ret = 0;
+ break;
case NBD_EPERM:
- return EPERM;
+ ret = EPERM;
+ break;
case NBD_EIO:
- return EIO;
+ ret = EIO;
+ break;
case NBD_ENOMEM:
- return ENOMEM;
+ ret = ENOMEM;
+ break;
case NBD_ENOSPC:
- return ENOSPC;
+ ret = ENOSPC;
+ break;
default:
TRACE("Squashing unexpected error %d to EINVAL", err);
/* fallthrough */
case NBD_EINVAL:
- return EINVAL;
+ ret = EINVAL;
+ break;
}
+ return ret;
}
/* Definitions for opaque data types */