We have a struct_mutex deadlock during driver init on ILK
[ 54.320273] =============================================
[ 54.320371] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
[ 54.320471] 3.15.0-rc2-flip_race+ #2 Not tainted
[ 54.320567] ---------------------------------------------
[ 54.320665] modprobe/2178 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 54.320762] (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<
ffffffffa0568b05>] intel_enable_gt_powersave+0xa5/0x9d0 [i915]
[ 54.321111]
[ 54.321111] but task is already holding lock:
[ 54.321250] (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<
ffffffffa05b4c2e>] intel_modeset_init_hw+0x3e/0x60 [i915]
[ 54.321583]
[ 54.321583] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 54.321724] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 54.321724]
[ 54.321863] CPU0
[ 54.321954] ----
[ 54.322046] lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
[ 54.322221] lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
[ 54.322397]
[ 54.322397] *** DEADLOCK ***
[ 54.322397]
[ 54.322638] May be due to missing lock nesting notation
[ 54.322638]
[ 54.322781] 4 locks held by modprobe/2178:
[ 54.322875] #0: (&dev->mutex){......}, at: [<
ffffffff813592eb>] __driver_attach+0x5b/0xb0
[ 54.323230] #1: (&dev->mutex){......}, at: [<
ffffffff813592f9>] __driver_attach+0x69/0xb0
[ 54.323582] #2: (drm_global_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<
ffffffffa04e1e0d>] drm_dev_register+0x2d/0x120 [drm]
[ 54.323945] #3: (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<
ffffffffa05b4c2e>] intel_modeset_init_hw+0x3e/0x60 [i915]
This regression got introduced in:
commit
586d5270b60dc1f35cc3ca982d403765bad77965
Author: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Date: Mon Apr 14 20:24:28 2014 +0300
drm/i915: move getting struct_mutex lower in the callstack during GPU reset
Fix the problem by not taking struct_mutex around intel_enable_gt_powersave()
in intel_modeset_init_hw() since intel_enable_gt_powersave() now grabs the
mutex itself.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>