* g++.dg/ext/attrib5.C: New test.

git-svn-id: svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@52160 138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
index 93ef461..eeb964a 100644 (file)
--- a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2002-04-11  Richard Sandiford  <rsandifo@redhat.com>
+
+       * g++.dg/ext/attrib5.C: New test.
+
 2002-04-10  Janis Johnson  <janis187@us.ibm.com>
 
        * g77.f-torture/execute/6177.f: New test.

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/attrib5.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/attrib5.C
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..4751193
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/attrib5.C
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+// There were two related problems here, depending on the vintage.  At
+// one time:
+//
+//    typedef struct A { ... } A __attribute__ ((aligned (16)));
+//
+// would cause original_types to go into an infinite loop.  At other
+// times, the attributes applied to an explicit typedef would be lost
+// (check_b2 would have a negative size).
+
+// First check that the declaration is accepted and has an effect.
+typedef struct A { int i; } A __attribute__ ((aligned (16)));
+int check_A[__alignof__ (A) >= 16 ? 1 : -1];
+
+// Check that the alignment is only applied to the typedef.
+struct B { int i; };
+namespace N { typedef B B; };
+typedef struct B B __attribute__((aligned (16)));
+N::B b1;
+B b2;
+int check_b1[__alignof__ (b1) == __alignof__ (int) ? 1 : -1];
+int check_b2[__alignof__ (b2) >= 16 ? 1 : -1];
+
+// The fix for this case involved a change to lookup_tag.  This 
+// bit just checks against a possible regression.
+namespace N { struct C; };
+typedef struct N::C C;         // { dg-error "previous declaration" }
+struct C;                      // { dg-error "conflicting types" }