[AArch64] Fix bogus MOVPRFX warning for GPR form of CPY

One of the MOVPRFX tests has:

  output register of preceding `movprfx' used as input at operand 3 -- `cpy z1.d,p1/m,x1'

But X1 and Z1 are not the same register, so the instruction is
actually OK.

2019-07-02  Richard Sandiford  <richard.sandiford@arm.com>

opcodes/
	* aarch64-opc.c (verify_constraints): Skip GPRs when scanning the
	registers in an instruction prefixed by MOVPRFX.

gas/
	* testsuite/gas/aarch64/sve-movprfx_25.s: Allow CPY Z1.D.P1/M,X1
	to be prefixed by MOVPRFX.
	* testsuite/gas/aarch64/sve-movprfx_25.d: Update accordingly.
	* testsuite/gas/aarch64/sve-movprfx_25.l: Likewise.

diff --git a/gas/ChangeLog b/gas/ChangeLog
index 355de66..05537e2 100644 (file)
--- a/gas/ChangeLog
+++ b/gas/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+2019-07-02  Richard Sandiford  <richard.sandiford@arm.com>
+
+       * testsuite/gas/aarch64/sve-movprfx_25.s: Allow CPY Z1.D.P1/M,X1
+       to be prefixed by MOVPRFX.
+       * testsuite/gas/aarch64/sve-movprfx_25.d: Update accordingly.
+       * testsuite/gas/aarch64/sve-movprfx_25.l: Likewise.
+
 2019-07-01  Nick Clifton  <nickc@redhat.com>
 
        PR 24748

diff --git a/gas/testsuite/gas/aarch64/sve-movprfx_25.d b/gas/testsuite/gas/aarch64/sve-movprfx_25.d
index 1573856..2b4f654 100644 (file)
--- a/gas/testsuite/gas/aarch64/sve-movprfx_25.d
+++ b/gas/testsuite/gas/aarch64/sve-movprfx_25.d
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ Disassembly of section .*:
 [^:]+: 04d12461        movprfx z1.d, p1/m, z3.d
 [^:]+: 05e8a441        mov     z1.d, p1/m, x2
 [^:]+: 04d12461        movprfx z1.d, p1/m, z3.d
-[^:]+: 05e8a421        mov     z1.d, p1/m, x1  // note: output register of preceding `movprfx' used as input at operand 3
+[^:]+: 05e8a421        mov     z1.d, p1/m, x1
 [^:]+: 04d12461        movprfx z1.d, p1/m, z3.d
 [^:]+: 05e08441        mov     z1.d, p1/m, d2
 [^:]+: 04d12461        movprfx z1.d, p1/m, z3.d

diff --git a/gas/testsuite/gas/aarch64/sve-movprfx_25.l b/gas/testsuite/gas/aarch64/sve-movprfx_25.l
index ec7e2db..259ad55 100644 (file)
--- a/gas/testsuite/gas/aarch64/sve-movprfx_25.l
+++ b/gas/testsuite/gas/aarch64/sve-movprfx_25.l
@@ -1,5 +1,4 @@
 [^:]*: Assembler messages:
 .*: Warning: predicate register differs from that in preceding `movprfx' at operand 2 -- `cpy z1.d,p9/m,#12'
 .*: Warning: merging predicate expected due to preceding `movprfx' at operand 2 -- `cpy z1.d,p1/z,#12'
-.*: Warning: output register of preceding `movprfx' used as input at operand 3 -- `cpy z1.d,p1/m,x1'
 .*: Warning: output register of preceding `movprfx' used as input at operand 3 -- `cpy z1.d,p1/m,d1'

diff --git a/gas/testsuite/gas/aarch64/sve-movprfx_25.s b/gas/testsuite/gas/aarch64/sve-movprfx_25.s
index 58124ce..0e64763 100644 (file)
--- a/gas/testsuite/gas/aarch64/sve-movprfx_25.s
+++ b/gas/testsuite/gas/aarch64/sve-movprfx_25.s
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ f:
    movprfx z1.d, p1/m, z3.d
    cpy z1.d, p1/m, x2
 
-   /* Not OK, scalar but register z1 and x1 are architecturally the same.  */
+   /* OK, scalar predicated, alias mov.  */
    movprfx z1.d, p1/m, z3.d
    cpy z1.d, p1/m, x1
 

diff --git a/opcodes/ChangeLog b/opcodes/ChangeLog
index 6f5fcdd..8b0da31 100644 (file)
--- a/opcodes/ChangeLog
+++ b/opcodes/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2019-07-02  Richard Sandiford  <richard.sandiford@arm.com>
+
+       * aarch64-opc.c (verify_constraints): Skip GPRs when scanning the
+       registers in an instruction prefixed by MOVPRFX.
+
 2019-07-01  Matthew Malcomson  <matthew.malcomson@arm.com>
 
        * aarch64-asm.c (aarch64_encode_variant_using_iclass): Use new

diff --git a/opcodes/aarch64-opc.c b/opcodes/aarch64-opc.c
index 00ff94d..7ffec2d 100644 (file)
--- a/opcodes/aarch64-opc.c
+++ b/opcodes/aarch64-opc.c
@@ -4968,11 +4968,6 @@ verify_constraints (const struct aarch64_inst *inst,
                  case AARCH64_OPND_Vm:
                  case AARCH64_OPND_Sn:
                  case AARCH64_OPND_Sm:
-                 case AARCH64_OPND_Rn:
-                 case AARCH64_OPND_Rm:
-                 case AARCH64_OPND_Rn_SP:
-                 case AARCH64_OPND_Rt_SP:
-                 case AARCH64_OPND_Rm_SP:
                    if (inst_op.reg.regno == blk_dest.reg.regno)
                      {
                        num_op_used++;