config: process udev "changed" and "add" events in the same code paths
authorLennart Poettering <lennart@poettering.net>
Mon, 18 Jul 2011 19:17:10 +0000 (21:17 +0200)
committerPeter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Tue, 26 Jul 2011 23:29:39 +0000 (09:29 +1000)
udev gives no guarantee that before each "changed" event for a device
there's an "add" event, or that before each "remove" is an "add", or
that before each "add" there was no "add" already and so on. Users can
trigger these events at any time with "udevadm trigger", and netlink is
a lossy transport, hence the events can come in unexpected ordering.

With other words: regardless which event is generated, the X server must
not choke on it and make the best of it, hence make sure that if we get
an "add" event for an existing device we don't add the device a second
time.

Signed-off-by: Lennart Poettering <lennart@poettering.net>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
config/udev.c

index 9ac34ee..5ac52a1 100644 (file)
@@ -251,14 +251,12 @@ wakeup_handler(pointer data, int err, pointer read_mask)
             return;
         action = udev_device_get_action(udev_device);
         if (action) {
-            if (!strcmp(action, "add"))
-                device_added(udev_device);
-            else if (!strcmp(action, "remove"))
-                device_removed(udev_device);
-            else if (!strcmp(action, "change")) {
+            if (!strcmp(action, "add") || !strcmp(action, "change")) {
                 device_removed(udev_device);
                 device_added(udev_device);
             }
+            else if (!strcmp(action, "remove"))
+                device_removed(udev_device);
         }
         udev_device_unref(udev_device);
     }