drm/amdgpu: rewording some left radeons
authorJammy Zhou <Jammy.Zhou@amd.com>
Wed, 13 May 2015 14:52:42 +0000 (22:52 +0800)
committerAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Thu, 4 Jun 2015 01:03:36 +0000 (21:03 -0400)
Signed-off-by: Jammy Zhou <Jammy.Zhou@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c

index 003fa2d..66b5bd0 100644 (file)
@@ -2164,7 +2164,7 @@ static inline struct amdgpu_fence *to_amdgpu_fence(struct fence *f)
 static inline void amdgpu_ring_write(struct amdgpu_ring *ring, uint32_t v)
 {
        if (ring->count_dw <= 0)
-               DRM_ERROR("radeon: writing more dwords to the ring than expected!\n");
+               DRM_ERROR("amdgpu: writing more dwords to the ring than expected!\n");
        ring->ring[ring->wptr++] = v;
        ring->wptr &= ring->ptr_mask;
        ring->count_dw--;
index fc63855..be4d535 100644 (file)
@@ -193,13 +193,13 @@ static bool amdgpu_fence_activity(struct amdgpu_ring *ring)
         * xchg of the current process.
         *
         * More over for this to go in infinite loop there need to be
-        * continuously new fence signaled ie radeon_fence_read needs
+        * continuously new fence signaled ie amdgpu_fence_read needs
         * to return a different value each time for both the currently
         * polling process and the other process that xchg the last_seq
         * btw atomic read and xchg of the current process. And the
         * value the other process set as last seq must be higher than
         * the seq value we just read. Which means that current process
-        * need to be interrupted after radeon_fence_read and before
+        * need to be interrupted after amdgpu_fence_read and before
         * atomic xchg.
         *
         * To be even more safe we count the number of time we loop and