struct rc_instruction * inst_add)
{
unsigned dstmask = inst_add->U.I.DstReg.WriteMask;
- struct rc_src_register * src1 = NULL;
- unsigned int i;
-
- if (!is_presub_candidate(c, inst_add))
- return 0;
+ unsigned src0_neg = inst_add->U.I.SrcReg[0].Negate & dstmask;
+ unsigned src1_neg = inst_add->U.I.SrcReg[1].Negate & dstmask;
if (inst_add->U.I.SrcReg[0].Swizzle != inst_add->U.I.SrcReg[1].Swizzle)
return 0;
- /* XXX This isn't fully implemented, is it? */
- /* src0 and src1 can't have absolute values only one can be negative and they must be all negative or all positive. */
- for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
- if (inst_add->U.I.SrcReg[i].Abs)
- return 0;
+ /* src0 and src1 can't have absolute values */
+ if (inst_add->U.I.SrcReg[0].Abs || inst_add->U.I.SrcReg[1].Abs)
+ return 0;
- /* XXX This looks weird, but it's basically what was here before this commit (see git blame): */
- if ((inst_add->U.I.SrcReg[i].Negate & dstmask) != dstmask && !src1) {
- src1 = &inst_add->U.I.SrcReg[i];
- }
- }
+ /* presub_replace_add() assumes only one is negative */
+ if (inst_add->U.I.SrcReg[0].Negate && inst_add->U.I.SrcReg[1].Negate)
+ return 0;
+
+ /* if src0 is negative, at least all bits of dstmask have to be set */
+ if (inst_add->U.I.SrcReg[0].Negate && src0_neg != dstmask)
+ return 0;
- if (!src1)
+ /* if src1 is negative, at least all bits of dstmask have to be set */
+ if (inst_add->U.I.SrcReg[1].Negate && src1_neg != dstmask)
+ return 0;
+
+ if (!is_presub_candidate(c, inst_add))
return 0;
if (presub_helper(c, inst_add, RC_PRESUB_ADD, presub_replace_add)) {
* of the add instruction must have the constatnt 1 swizzle. This function
* does not check const registers to see if their value is 1.0, so it should
* be called after the constant_folding optimization.
- * @return
+ * @return
* 0 if the ADD instruction is still part of the program.
* 1 if the ADD instruction is no longer part of the program.
*/