The binding already allows specifying both interrupt pins, but there
is currently no way to describe a board where (for whatever reason)
only INT2 is connected. Make it possible to use "interrupt-names"
to make it explicit which interrupt pin is meant in the interrupts.
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210802155657.102766-2-stephan@gerhold.net
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
minItems: 1
maxItems: 2
description: |
- The first interrupt listed must be the one connected to the INT1 pin,
- the second (optional) interrupt listed must be the one connected to the
- INT2 pin (if available). The type should be IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING.
+ Without interrupt-names, the first interrupt listed must be the one
+ connected to the INT1 pin, the second (optional) interrupt listed must be
+ the one connected to the INT2 pin (if available). The type should be
+ IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING.
+
+ interrupt-names:
+ minItems: 1
+ maxItems: 2
+ items:
+ enum:
+ - INT1
+ - INT2
mount-matrix:
description: an optional 3x3 mounting rotation matrix.
vddio-supply = <&vddio>;
vdd-supply = <&vdd>;
interrupts = <57 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+ interrupt-names = "INT1";
};
};
- |