commit
8eee539ddea09bccae2426f09b0ba6a18b72b691 upstream.
Problems occur when bpf_to or bpf_from has value prog->len - 1 (e.g.,
"Very long jump backwards" in test_bpf where the last instruction is a
jump): since ctx->offset has length prog->len, ctx->offset[bpf_to + 1]
or ctx->offset[bpf_from + 1] will cause an out-of-bounds read, leading
to a bogus jump offset and kernel panic.
This patch moves updating ctx->offset to after calling build_insn(),
and changes indexing to use bpf_to and bpf_from without + 1.
Fixes:
e54bcde3d69d ("arm64: eBPF JIT compiler")
Cc: Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
static inline int bpf2a64_offset(int bpf_to, int bpf_from,
const struct jit_ctx *ctx)
{
- int to = ctx->offset[bpf_to + 1];
+ int to = ctx->offset[bpf_to];
/* -1 to account for the Branch instruction */
- int from = ctx->offset[bpf_from + 1] - 1;
+ int from = ctx->offset[bpf_from] - 1;
return to - from;
}
const struct bpf_insn *insn = &prog->insnsi[i];
int ret;
+ ret = build_insn(insn, ctx);
+
if (ctx->image == NULL)
ctx->offset[i] = ctx->idx;
- ret = build_insn(insn, ctx);
if (ret > 0) {
i++;
continue;