Suggesting changing "async.map(rs)" to "responses = async.map(rs)" just to show that...
authorDaniel Miller <dalan.miller@gmail.com>
Thu, 22 Mar 2012 18:57:19 +0000 (11:57 -0700)
committerDaniel Miller <dalan.miller@gmail.com>
Thu, 22 Mar 2012 18:57:19 +0000 (11:57 -0700)
docs/user/advanced.rst

index 7c14ba1..53762eb 100644 (file)
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ one at a time with ``Request.send()``, but that would take a while.  Instead,
 we'll send them all at the same time with ``async.map()``.  Using ``async.map()``
 will also guarantee execution of the ``response`` hook, described below. ::
 
-    >>> async.map(rs)
+    >>> responses = async.map(rs)
     [<Response [200]>, <Response [200]>, <Response [200]>, <Response [200]>]
 
 .. admonition:: Throttling