bpf: Skip rcu_barrier() if rcu_trace_implies_rcu_gp() is true
authorHou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Fri, 9 Dec 2022 01:09:47 +0000 (09:09 +0800)
committerAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Fri, 9 Dec 2022 01:50:17 +0000 (17:50 -0800)
If there are pending rcu callback, free_mem_alloc() will use
rcu_barrier_tasks_trace() and rcu_barrier() to wait for the pending
__free_rcu_tasks_trace() and __free_rcu() callback.

If rcu_trace_implies_rcu_gp() is true, there will be no pending
__free_rcu(), so it will be OK to skip rcu_barrier() as well.

Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221209010947.3130477-3-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
kernel/bpf/memalloc.c

index 04d96d1..ebcc3dd 100644 (file)
@@ -464,9 +464,17 @@ static void free_mem_alloc(struct bpf_mem_alloc *ma)
 {
        /* waiting_for_gp lists was drained, but __free_rcu might
         * still execute. Wait for it now before we freeing percpu caches.
+        *
+        * rcu_barrier_tasks_trace() doesn't imply synchronize_rcu_tasks_trace(),
+        * but rcu_barrier_tasks_trace() and rcu_barrier() below are only used
+        * to wait for the pending __free_rcu_tasks_trace() and __free_rcu(),
+        * so if call_rcu(head, __free_rcu) is skipped due to
+        * rcu_trace_implies_rcu_gp(), it will be OK to skip rcu_barrier() by
+        * using rcu_trace_implies_rcu_gp() as well.
         */
        rcu_barrier_tasks_trace();
-       rcu_barrier();
+       if (!rcu_trace_implies_rcu_gp())
+               rcu_barrier();
        free_mem_alloc_no_barrier(ma);
 }