memblockq-test: Rename test to something more relevant
authorArun Raghavan <arun@arunraghavan.net>
Fri, 22 Jul 2016 09:51:20 +0000 (15:21 +0530)
committerArun Raghavan <arun@arunraghavan.net>
Fri, 22 Jul 2016 10:19:59 +0000 (15:49 +0530)
We now have a separate test for _pop_missing().

src/tests/memblockq-test.c

index 3673f84..1404c78 100644 (file)
@@ -518,7 +518,7 @@ START_TEST (memblockq_test_pop_missing) {
 }
 END_TEST
 
-START_TEST (pop_missing_test) {
+START_TEST (memblockq_test_tlength_change) {
     int ret;
     size_t missing;
 
@@ -614,7 +614,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
     tcase_add_test(tc, memblockq_test);
     tcase_add_test(tc, memblockq_test_length_changes);
     tcase_add_test(tc, memblockq_test_pop_missing);
-    tcase_add_test(tc, pop_missing_test);
+    tcase_add_test(tc, memblockq_test_tlength_change);
     suite_add_tcase(s, tc);
 
     sr = srunner_create(s);