net/ibmvnic: Cleanup workaround doing an EOI after partition migration
authorCédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Fri, 18 Feb 2022 08:07:08 +0000 (09:07 +0100)
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Fri, 18 Feb 2022 11:47:48 +0000 (11:47 +0000)
There were a fair amount of changes to workaround a firmware bug leaving
a pending interrupt after migration of the ibmvnic device :

commit 2df5c60e198c ("net/ibmvnic: Ignore H_FUNCTION return from H_EOI
            to tolerate XIVE mode")
commit 284f87d2f387 ("Revert "net/ibmvnic: Fix EOI when running in
            XIVE mode"")
commit 11d49ce9f794 ("net/ibmvnic: Fix EOI when running in XIVE mode.")
commit f23e0643cd0b ("ibmvnic: Clear pending interrupt after device reset")

Here is the final one taking into account the XIVE interrupt mode.

Cc: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Dany Madden <drt@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c

index 29617a8..61975cb 100644 (file)
@@ -60,6 +60,7 @@
 #include <asm/hvcall.h>
 #include <linux/atomic.h>
 #include <asm/vio.h>
+#include <asm/xive.h>
 #include <asm/iommu.h>
 #include <linux/uaccess.h>
 #include <asm/firmware.h>
@@ -3562,6 +3563,30 @@ static int disable_scrq_irq(struct ibmvnic_adapter *adapter,
        return rc;
 }
 
+/* We can not use the IRQ chip EOI handler because that has the
+ * unintended effect of changing the interrupt priority.
+ */
+static void ibmvnic_xics_eoi(struct device *dev, struct ibmvnic_sub_crq_queue *scrq)
+{
+       u64 val = 0xff000000 | scrq->hw_irq;
+       unsigned long rc;
+
+       rc = plpar_hcall_norets(H_EOI, val);
+       if (rc)
+               dev_err(dev, "H_EOI FAILED irq 0x%llx. rc=%ld\n", val, rc);
+}
+
+/* Due to a firmware bug, the hypervisor can send an interrupt to a
+ * transmit or receive queue just prior to a partition migration.
+ * Force an EOI after migration.
+ */
+static void ibmvnic_clear_pending_interrupt(struct device *dev,
+                                           struct ibmvnic_sub_crq_queue *scrq)
+{
+       if (!xive_enabled())
+               ibmvnic_xics_eoi(dev, scrq);
+}
+
 static int enable_scrq_irq(struct ibmvnic_adapter *adapter,
                           struct ibmvnic_sub_crq_queue *scrq)
 {
@@ -3575,15 +3600,7 @@ static int enable_scrq_irq(struct ibmvnic_adapter *adapter,
 
        if (test_bit(0, &adapter->resetting) &&
            adapter->reset_reason == VNIC_RESET_MOBILITY) {
-               u64 val = (0xff000000) | scrq->hw_irq;
-
-               rc = plpar_hcall_norets(H_EOI, val);
-               /* H_EOI would fail with rc = H_FUNCTION when running
-                * in XIVE mode which is expected, but not an error.
-                */
-               if (rc && (rc != H_FUNCTION))
-                       dev_err(dev, "H_EOI FAILED irq 0x%llx. rc=%ld\n",
-                               val, rc);
+               ibmvnic_clear_pending_interrupt(dev, scrq);
        }
 
        rc = plpar_hcall_norets(H_VIOCTL, adapter->vdev->unit_address,