The status FC_CTELS_STATUS_REJECT for all FC BSG errors is not
appropriate. Instead, report -EIO in the result field if there was a
problem in zfcp with the FC BSG request. If the request is good from
our point of view, report result 0, status FC_CTELS_STATUS_OK and let
userspace read the Accept or Reject from the payload (as documented in
scsi_bsg_fc.h).
Signed-off-by: Swen Schillig <swen@vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christof Schmitt <christof.schmitt@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
{
struct fc_bsg_job *job = data;
struct zfcp_fsf_ct_els *zfcp_ct_els = job->dd_data;
- int status = zfcp_ct_els->status;
- int reply_status;
+ struct fc_bsg_reply *jr = job->reply;
- reply_status = status ? FC_CTELS_STATUS_REJECT : FC_CTELS_STATUS_OK;
- job->reply->reply_data.ctels_reply.status = reply_status;
- job->reply->reply_payload_rcv_len = job->reply_payload.payload_len;
+ jr->reply_payload_rcv_len = job->reply_payload.payload_len;
+ jr->reply_data.ctels_reply.status = FC_CTELS_STATUS_OK;
+ jr->result = zfcp_ct_els->status ? -EIO : 0;
job->job_done(job);
}