[ Upstream commit
542bcea4be866b14b3a5c8e90773329066656c43 ]
We use BH context only for synchronization, so we don't care if it's
actually serving softirq or not.
As a side node, in case of threaded NAPI, in_serving_softirq() will
return false because it's in process context with BH off, making
page_pool_recycle_in_cache() unreachable.
Signed-off-by: Qingfang DENG <qingfang.deng@siflower.com.cn>
Tested-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Stable-dep-of:
368d3cb406cd ("page_pool: fix inconsistency for page_pool_ring_[un]lock()")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
static inline void page_pool_ring_lock(struct page_pool *pool)
__acquires(&pool->ring.producer_lock)
{
- if (in_serving_softirq())
+ if (in_softirq())
spin_lock(&pool->ring.producer_lock);
else
spin_lock_bh(&pool->ring.producer_lock);
static inline void page_pool_ring_unlock(struct page_pool *pool)
__releases(&pool->ring.producer_lock)
{
- if (in_serving_softirq())
+ if (in_softirq())
spin_unlock(&pool->ring.producer_lock);
else
spin_unlock_bh(&pool->ring.producer_lock);
static bool page_pool_recycle_in_ring(struct page_pool *pool, struct page *page)
{
int ret;
- /* BH protection not needed if current is serving softirq */
- if (in_serving_softirq())
+ /* BH protection not needed if current is softirq */
+ if (in_softirq())
ret = ptr_ring_produce(&pool->ring, page);
else
ret = ptr_ring_produce_bh(&pool->ring, page);
page_pool_dma_sync_for_device(pool, page,
dma_sync_size);
- if (allow_direct && in_serving_softirq() &&
+ if (allow_direct && in_softirq() &&
page_pool_recycle_in_cache(page, pool))
return NULL;