parport: fix coding style

The multi-line comments were not according to the kernel coding style.

Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@vectorindia.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

diff --git a/drivers/parport/share.c b/drivers/parport/share.c
index d85e566..840c730 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/parport/share.c
+++ b/drivers/parport/share.c
@@ -207,8 +207,10 @@ static void detach_driver_chain(struct parport *port)
 /* Ask kmod for some lowlevel drivers. */
 static void get_lowlevel_driver (void)
 {
-       /* There is no actual module called this: you should set
-        * up an alias for modutils. */
+       /*
+        * There is no actual module called this: you should set
+        * up an alias for modutils.
+        */
        request_module ("parport_lowlevel");
 }
 
@@ -728,11 +730,12 @@ parport_register_device(struct parport *port, const char *name,
                }
        }
 
-       /* We up our own module reference count, and that of the port
-           on which a device is to be registered, to ensure that
-           neither of us gets unloaded while we sleep in (e.g.)
-           kmalloc.
-         */
+       /*
+        * We up our own module reference count, and that of the port
+        * on which a device is to be registered, to ensure that
+        * neither of us gets unloaded while we sleep in (e.g.)
+        * kmalloc.
+        */
        if (!try_module_get(port->ops->owner)) {
                return NULL;
        }
@@ -783,9 +786,11 @@ parport_register_device(struct parport *port, const char *name,
        }
 
        tmp->next = port->physport->devices;
-       wmb(); /* Make sure that tmp->next is written before it's
-                  added to the list; see comments marked 'no locking
-                  required' */
+       wmb(); /*
+               * Make sure that tmp->next is written before it's
+               * added to the list; see comments marked 'no locking
+               * required'
+               */
        if (port->physport->devices)
                port->physport->devices->prev = tmp;
        port->physport->devices = tmp;
@@ -1008,8 +1013,10 @@ void parport_unregister_device(struct pardevice *dev)
 
        spin_unlock(&port->pardevice_lock);
 
-       /* Make sure we haven't left any pointers around in the wait
-        * list. */
+       /*
+        * Make sure we haven't left any pointers around in the wait
+        * list.
+        */
        spin_lock_irq(&port->waitlist_lock);
        if (dev->waitprev || dev->waitnext || port->waithead == dev) {
                if (dev->waitprev)
@@ -1131,8 +1138,10 @@ int parport_claim(struct pardevice *dev)
                        goto blocked;
 
                if (port->cad != oldcad) {
-                       /* I think we'll actually deadlock rather than
-                           get here, but just in case.. */
+                       /*
+                        * I think we'll actually deadlock rather than
+                        * get here, but just in case..
+                        */
                        printk(KERN_WARNING
                               "%s: %s released port when preempted!\n",
                               port->name, oldcad->name);
@@ -1185,9 +1194,11 @@ int parport_claim(struct pardevice *dev)
        return 0;
 
 blocked:
-       /* If this is the first time we tried to claim the port, register an
-          interest.  This is only allowed for devices sleeping in
-          parport_claim_or_block(), or those with a wakeup function.  */
+       /*
+        * If this is the first time we tried to claim the port, register an
+        * interest.  This is only allowed for devices sleeping in
+        * parport_claim_or_block(), or those with a wakeup function.
+        */
 
        /* The cad_lock is still held for writing here */
        if (dev->waiting & 2 || dev->wakeup) {
@@ -1223,8 +1234,10 @@ int parport_claim_or_block(struct pardevice *dev)
 {
        int r;
 
-       /* Signal to parport_claim() that we can wait even without a
-          wakeup function.  */
+       /*
+        * Signal to parport_claim() that we can wait even without a
+        * wakeup function.
+        */
        dev->waiting = 2;
 
        /* Try to claim the port.  If this fails, we need to sleep.  */
@@ -1242,8 +1255,10 @@ int parport_claim_or_block(struct pardevice *dev)
                 * See also parport_release()
                 */
 
-               /* If dev->waiting is clear now, an interrupt
-                  gave us the port and we would deadlock if we slept.  */
+               /*
+                * If dev->waiting is clear now, an interrupt
+                * gave us the port and we would deadlock if we slept.
+                */
                if (dev->waiting) {
                        wait_event_interruptible(dev->wait_q,
                                                 !dev->waiting);
@@ -1316,8 +1331,10 @@ void parport_release(struct pardevice *dev)
        /* Save control registers */
        port->ops->save_state(port, dev->state);
 
-       /* If anybody is waiting, find out who's been there longest and
-          then wake them up. (Note: no locking required) */
+       /*
+        * If anybody is waiting, find out who's been there longest and
+        * then wake them up. (Note: no locking required)
+        */
        /* !!! LOCKING IS NEEDED HERE */
        for (pd = port->waithead; pd; pd = pd->waitnext) {
                if (pd->waiting & 2) { /* sleeping in claim_or_block */
@@ -1334,8 +1351,10 @@ void parport_release(struct pardevice *dev)
                }
        }
 
-       /* Nobody was waiting, so walk the list to see if anyone is
-          interested in being woken up. (Note: no locking required) */
+       /*
+        * Nobody was waiting, so walk the list to see if anyone is
+        * interested in being woken up. (Note: no locking required)
+        */
        /* !!! LOCKING IS NEEDED HERE */
        for (pd = port->devices; (port->cad == NULL) && pd; pd = pd->next) {
                if (pd->wakeup && pd != dev)