The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit
76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@oracle.com>
loff_t position;
int ino;
u16 name_len;
- char name[0];
+ char name[];
};
/*
u8 flag; /* Unused? */
u8 namelen; /* Length of name */
__le16 valuelen; /* Length of value */
- char name[0]; /* Attribute name (includes null-terminator) */
+ char name[]; /* Attribute name (includes null-terminator) */
}; /* Value immediately follows name */
struct jfs_ea_list {
__le32 size; /* overall size */
- struct jfs_ea ea[0]; /* Variable length list */
+ struct jfs_ea ea[]; /* Variable length list */
};
/* Macros for defining maxiumum number of bytes supported for EAs */