For stack frames on the size of a register in x86, a code size optimization
emits "push rax/eax" instead of "sub" for stack allocation. For example:
foo:
.cfi_startproc
BB#0:
pushq %rax
Ltmp0:
.cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
...
.cfi_endproc
However, we are falling back to DWARF in this case because we cannot
encode %rax as a saved register.
This requirement is wrong, since we don't care about the contents of
%rax, it is the equivalent of a sub.
In order to specify that we care about the contents of %rax, we would
need a .cfi_offset %rax, <offset>.
It's also overzealous in the case where there are pushes for callee saved
registers followed by a "push rax/eax" instead of "sub", in which case we should
also be able to encode the callee saved regs and everything else using compact
unwind.
Patch authored by Bruno Cardoso Lopes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D13793
llvm-svn: 350623
CompactUnwindEncoding |= (StackAdjust & 0xFF) << 16;
CompactUnwindEncoding |= RegEnc & CU::UNWIND_BP_FRAME_REGISTERS;
} else {
- // If the amount of the stack allocation is the size of a register, then
- // we "push" the RAX/EAX register onto the stack instead of adjusting the
- // stack pointer with a SUB instruction. We don't support the push of the
- // RAX/EAX register with compact unwind. So we check for that situation
- // here.
- if ((NumDefCFAOffsets == SavedRegIdx + 1 &&
- StackSize - PrevStackSize == 1) ||
- (Instrs.size() == 1 && NumDefCFAOffsets == 1 && StackSize == 2))
- return CU::UNWIND_MODE_DWARF;
-
SubtractInstrIdx += InstrOffset;
++StackAdjust;
retq
.cfi_endproc
+# Check that a adjustment through a push %rax is the same as a sub.
+
+# CHECK: Entry at offset 0x40:
+# CHECK-NEXT: start: 0x2a _testrax
+# CHECK-NEXT: length: 0x5
+# CHECK-NEXT: compact encoding: 0x02020000
+ .globl _testrax
+_testrax: ## @testrax
+ .cfi_startproc
+## %bb.0: ## %entry
+ pushq %rax
+Ltmp15:
+ .cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
+ xorl %eax, %eax
+ popq %rax
+ retq
+ .cfi_endproc
+
.section __TEXT,__cstring,cstring_literals
L_.str: ## @.str
.asciz "%d\n"