Taking the address of the entry block is illegal.
This value only has defined behavior when used as an operand to the
-':ref:`indirectbr <i_indirectbr>`' instruction, or for comparisons
-against null. Pointer equality tests between labels addresses results in
-undefined behavior --- though, again, comparison against null is ok, and
-no label is equal to the null pointer. This may be passed around as an
+':ref:`indirectbr <i_indirectbr>`' or ':ref:`callbr <i_callbr>`'instruction, or
+for comparisons against null. Pointer equality tests between labels addresses
+results in undefined behavior --- though, again, comparison against null is ok,
+and no label is equal to the null pointer. This may be passed around as an
opaque pointer sized value as long as the bits are not inspected. This
allows ``ptrtoint`` and arithmetic to be performed on these values so
-long as the original value is reconstituted before the ``indirectbr``
-instruction.
+long as the original value is reconstituted before the ``indirectbr`` or
+``callbr`` instruction.
Finally, some targets may provide defined semantics when using the value
as the operand to an inline assembly, but that is target specific.