let Documentation = [SectionDocs];
}
+def CodeSeg : InheritableAttr {
+ let Spellings = [Declspec<"code_seg">];
+ let Args = [StringArgument<"Name">];
+ let Subjects = SubjectList<[Function, CXXRecord], ErrorDiag>;
+ let Documentation = [CodeSegDocs];
+}
+
def PragmaClangBSSSection : InheritableAttr {
// This attribute has no spellings as it is only ever created implicitly.
let Spellings = [];
}];
}
+def CodeSegDocs : Documentation {
+ let Category = DocCatFunction;
+ let Content = [{
+The ``__declspec(code_seg)`` attribute enables the placement of code into separate
+named segments that can be paged or locked in memory individually. This attribute
+is used to control the placement of instantiated templates and compiler-generated
+code. See the documentation for `__declspec(code_seg)`_ on MSDN.
+
+.. _`__declspec(code_seg)`: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn636922.aspx
+ }];
+}
+
def AllocAlignDocs : Documentation {
let Category = DocCatFunction;
let Content = [{
"access specifier can only have annotation attributes">;
def err_attribute_section_invalid_for_target : Error<
- "argument to 'section' attribute is not valid for this target: %0">;
+ "argument to %select{'code_seg'|'section'}1 attribute is not valid for this target: %0">;
def warn_mismatched_section : Warning<
- "section does not match previous declaration">, InGroup<Section>;
+ "%select{codeseg|section}0 does not match previous declaration">, InGroup<Section>;
def warn_attribute_section_on_redeclaration : Warning<
"section attribute is specified on redeclared variable">, InGroup<Section>;
+def err_mismatched_code_seg_base : Error<
+ "derived class must specify the same code segment as its base classes">;
+def err_mismatched_code_seg_override : Error<
+ "overriding virtual function must specify the same code segment as its overridden function">;
+def err_conflicting_codeseg_attribute : Error<
+ "conflicting code segment specifiers">;
+def warn_duplicate_codeseg_attribute : Warning<
+ "duplicate code segment specifiers">, InGroup<Section>;
def err_anonymous_property: Error<
"anonymous property is not supported">;
bool shouldLinkDependentDeclWithPrevious(Decl *D, Decl *OldDecl);
void CheckMain(FunctionDecl *FD, const DeclSpec &D);
void CheckMSVCRTEntryPoint(FunctionDecl *FD);
+ Attr *getImplicitCodeSegOrSectionAttrForFunction(const FunctionDecl *FD, bool IsDefinition);
Decl *ActOnParamDeclarator(Scope *S, Declarator &D);
ParmVarDecl *BuildParmVarDeclForTypedef(DeclContext *DC,
SourceLocation Loc,
int FirstArg, unsigned AttrSpellingListIndex);
SectionAttr *mergeSectionAttr(Decl *D, SourceRange Range, StringRef Name,
unsigned AttrSpellingListIndex);
+ CodeSegAttr *mergeCodeSegAttr(Decl *D, SourceRange Range, StringRef Name,
+ unsigned AttrSpellingListIndex);
AlwaysInlineAttr *mergeAlwaysInlineAttr(Decl *D, SourceRange Range,
IdentifierInfo *Ident,
unsigned AttrSpellingListIndex);
/// ensure that referenceDLLExportedClassMethods is called some point later
/// when all outer classes of Class are complete.
void checkClassLevelDLLAttribute(CXXRecordDecl *Class);
+ void checkClassLevelCodeSegAttribute(CXXRecordDecl *Class);
void referenceDLLExportedClassMethods();
F->addAttributes(llvm::AttributeList::FunctionIndex, Attrs);
}
}
-
- if (const SectionAttr *SA = D->getAttr<SectionAttr>())
+
+ if (const auto *CSA = D->getAttr<CodeSegAttr>())
+ GO->setSection(CSA->getName());
+ else if (const auto *SA = D->getAttr<SectionAttr>())
GO->setSection(SA->getName());
}
setLinkageForGV(F, FD);
setGVProperties(F, FD);
- if (const SectionAttr *SA = FD->getAttr<SectionAttr>())
- F->setSection(SA->getName());
+ if (const auto *CSA = FD->getAttr<CodeSegAttr>())
+ F->setSection(CSA->getName());
+ else if (const auto *SA = FD->getAttr<SectionAttr>())
+ F->setSection(SA->getName());
if (FD->isReplaceableGlobalAllocationFunction()) {
// A replaceable global allocation function does not act like a builtin by
else if (const auto *SA = dyn_cast<SectionAttr>(Attr))
NewAttr = S.mergeSectionAttr(D, SA->getRange(), SA->getName(),
AttrSpellingListIndex);
+ else if (const auto *CSA = dyn_cast<CodeSegAttr>(Attr))
+ NewAttr = S.mergeCodeSegAttr(D, CSA->getRange(), CSA->getName(),
+ AttrSpellingListIndex);
else if (const auto *IA = dyn_cast<MSInheritanceAttr>(Attr))
NewAttr = S.mergeMSInheritanceAttr(D, IA->getRange(), IA->getBestCase(),
AttrSpellingListIndex,
}
}
+ // Redeclaration adds code-seg attribute.
+ const auto *NewCSA = New->getAttr<CodeSegAttr>();
+ if (NewCSA && !Old->hasAttr<CodeSegAttr>() &&
+ !NewCSA->isImplicit() && isa<CXXMethodDecl>(New)) {
+ Diag(New->getLocation(), diag::warn_mismatched_section)
+ << 0 /*codeseg*/;
+ Diag(Old->getLocation(), diag::note_previous_declaration);
+ }
+
if (!Old->hasAttrs())
return;
NewFD->dropAttr<SectionAttr>();
}
+ // Apply an implicit CodeSegAttr from class declspec or
+ // apply an implicit SectionAttr from #pragma code_seg if active.
+ if (!NewFD->hasAttr<CodeSegAttr>()) {
+ if (Attr *SAttr = getImplicitCodeSegOrSectionAttrForFunction(NewFD,
+ D.isFunctionDefinition())) {
+ NewFD->addAttr(SAttr);
+ }
+ }
+
// Handle attributes.
ProcessDeclAttributes(S, NewFD, D);
return NewFD;
}
+/// Return a CodeSegAttr from a containing class. The Microsoft docs say
+/// when __declspec(code_seg) "is applied to a class, all member functions of
+/// the class and nested classes -- this includes compiler-generated special
+/// member functions -- are put in the specified segment."
+/// The actual behavior is a little more complicated. The Microsoft compiler
+/// won't check outer classes if there is an active value from #pragma code_seg.
+/// The CodeSeg is always applied from the direct parent but only from outer
+/// classes when the #pragma code_seg stack is empty. See:
+/// https://reviews.llvm.org/D22931, the Microsoft feedback page is no longer
+/// available since MS has removed the page.
+static Attr *getImplicitCodeSegAttrFromClass(Sema &S, const FunctionDecl *FD) {
+ const auto *Method = dyn_cast<CXXMethodDecl>(FD);
+ if (!Method)
+ return nullptr;
+ const CXXRecordDecl *Parent = Method->getParent();
+ if (const auto *SAttr = Parent->getAttr<CodeSegAttr>()) {
+ Attr *NewAttr = SAttr->clone(S.getASTContext());
+ NewAttr->setImplicit(true);
+ return NewAttr;
+ }
+
+ // The Microsoft compiler won't check outer classes for the CodeSeg
+ // when the #pragma code_seg stack is active.
+ if (S.CodeSegStack.CurrentValue)
+ return nullptr;
+
+ while ((Parent = dyn_cast<CXXRecordDecl>(Parent->getParent()))) {
+ if (const auto *SAttr = Parent->getAttr<CodeSegAttr>()) {
+ Attr *NewAttr = SAttr->clone(S.getASTContext());
+ NewAttr->setImplicit(true);
+ return NewAttr;
+ }
+ }
+ return nullptr;
+}
+
+/// Returns an implicit CodeSegAttr if a __declspec(code_seg) is found on a
+/// containing class. Otherwise it will return implicit SectionAttr if the
+/// function is a definition and there is an active value on CodeSegStack
+/// (from the current #pragma code-seg value).
+///
+/// \param FD Function being declared.
+/// \param IsDefinition Whether it is a definition or just a declarartion.
+/// \returns A CodeSegAttr or SectionAttr to apply to the function or
+/// nullptr if no attribute should be added.
+Attr *Sema::getImplicitCodeSegOrSectionAttrForFunction(const FunctionDecl *FD,
+ bool IsDefinition) {
+ if (Attr *A = getImplicitCodeSegAttrFromClass(*this, FD))
+ return A;
+ if (!FD->hasAttr<SectionAttr>() && IsDefinition &&
+ CodeSegStack.CurrentValue) {
+ return SectionAttr::CreateImplicit(getASTContext(),
+ SectionAttr::Declspec_allocate,
+ CodeSegStack.CurrentValue->getString(),
+ CodeSegStack.CurrentPragmaLocation);
+ }
+ return nullptr;
+}
/// Checks if the new declaration declared in dependent context must be
/// put in the same redeclaration chain as the specified declaration.
///
SectionAttr *Sema::mergeSectionAttr(Decl *D, SourceRange Range,
StringRef Name,
unsigned AttrSpellingListIndex) {
+ // Explicit or partial specializations do not inherit
+ // the section attribute from the primary template.
+ if (const auto *FD = dyn_cast<FunctionDecl>(D)) {
+ if (AttrSpellingListIndex == SectionAttr::Declspec_allocate &&
+ FD->isFunctionTemplateSpecialization())
+ return nullptr;
+ }
if (SectionAttr *ExistingAttr = D->getAttr<SectionAttr>()) {
if (ExistingAttr->getName() == Name)
return nullptr;
- Diag(ExistingAttr->getLocation(), diag::warn_mismatched_section);
+ Diag(ExistingAttr->getLocation(), diag::warn_mismatched_section)
+ << 1 /*section*/;
Diag(Range.getBegin(), diag::note_previous_attribute);
return nullptr;
}
bool Sema::checkSectionName(SourceLocation LiteralLoc, StringRef SecName) {
std::string Error = Context.getTargetInfo().isValidSectionSpecifier(SecName);
if (!Error.empty()) {
- Diag(LiteralLoc, diag::err_attribute_section_invalid_for_target) << Error;
+ Diag(LiteralLoc, diag::err_attribute_section_invalid_for_target) << Error
+ << 1 /*'section'*/;
return false;
}
return true;
D->addAttr(NewAttr);
}
+static bool checkCodeSegName(Sema&S, SourceLocation LiteralLoc, StringRef CodeSegName) {
+ std::string Error = S.Context.getTargetInfo().isValidSectionSpecifier(CodeSegName);
+ if (!Error.empty()) {
+ S.Diag(LiteralLoc, diag::err_attribute_section_invalid_for_target) << Error
+ << 0 /*'code-seg'*/;
+ return false;
+ }
+ return true;
+}
+
+CodeSegAttr *Sema::mergeCodeSegAttr(Decl *D, SourceRange Range,
+ StringRef Name,
+ unsigned AttrSpellingListIndex) {
+ // Explicit or partial specializations do not inherit
+ // the code_seg attribute from the primary template.
+ if (const auto *FD = dyn_cast<FunctionDecl>(D)) {
+ if (FD->isFunctionTemplateSpecialization())
+ return nullptr;
+ }
+ if (const auto *ExistingAttr = D->getAttr<CodeSegAttr>()) {
+ if (ExistingAttr->getName() == Name)
+ return nullptr;
+ Diag(ExistingAttr->getLocation(), diag::warn_mismatched_section)
+ << 0 /*codeseg*/;
+ Diag(Range.getBegin(), diag::note_previous_attribute);
+ return nullptr;
+ }
+ return ::new (Context) CodeSegAttr(Range, Context, Name,
+ AttrSpellingListIndex);
+}
+
+static void handleCodeSegAttr(Sema &S, Decl *D, const ParsedAttr &AL) {
+ StringRef Str;
+ SourceLocation LiteralLoc;
+ if (!S.checkStringLiteralArgumentAttr(AL, 0, Str, &LiteralLoc))
+ return;
+ if (!checkCodeSegName(S, LiteralLoc, Str))
+ return;
+ if (const auto *ExistingAttr = D->getAttr<CodeSegAttr>()) {
+ if (!ExistingAttr->isImplicit()) {
+ S.Diag(AL.getLoc(),
+ ExistingAttr->getName() == Str
+ ? diag::warn_duplicate_codeseg_attribute
+ : diag::err_conflicting_codeseg_attribute);
+ return;
+ }
+ D->dropAttr<CodeSegAttr>();
+ }
+ if (CodeSegAttr *CSA = S.mergeCodeSegAttr(D, AL.getRange(), Str,
+ AL.getAttributeSpellingListIndex()))
+ D->addAttr(CSA);
+}
+
// Check for things we'd like to warn about. Multiversioning issues are
// handled later in the process, once we know how many exist.
bool Sema::checkTargetAttr(SourceLocation LiteralLoc, StringRef AttrStr) {
case ParsedAttr::AT_Section:
handleSectionAttr(S, D, AL);
break;
+ case ParsedAttr::AT_CodeSeg:
+ handleCodeSegAttr(S, D, AL);
+ break;
case ParsedAttr::AT_Target:
handleTargetAttr(S, D, AL);
break;
CXXRecordDecl *CXXBaseDecl = cast<CXXRecordDecl>(BaseDecl);
assert(CXXBaseDecl && "Base type is not a C++ type");
+ // Microsoft docs say:
+ // "If a base-class has a code_seg attribute, derived classes must have the
+ // same attribute."
+ const auto *BaseCSA = CXXBaseDecl->getAttr<CodeSegAttr>();
+ const auto *DerivedCSA = Class->getAttr<CodeSegAttr>();
+ if ((DerivedCSA || BaseCSA) &&
+ (!BaseCSA || !DerivedCSA || BaseCSA->getName() != DerivedCSA->getName())) {
+ Diag(Class->getLocation(), diag::err_mismatched_code_seg_base);
+ Diag(CXXBaseDecl->getLocation(), diag::note_base_class_specified_here)
+ << CXXBaseDecl;
+ return nullptr;
+ }
+
// A class which contains a flexible array member is not suitable for use as a
// base class:
// - If the layout determines that a base comes before another base,
}
}
+void Sema::checkClassLevelCodeSegAttribute(CXXRecordDecl *Class) {
+ // Mark any compiler-generated routines with the implicit code_seg attribute.
+ for (auto *Method : Class->methods()) {
+ if (Method->isUserProvided())
+ continue;
+ if (Attr *A = getImplicitCodeSegOrSectionAttrForFunction(Method, /*IsDefinition=*/true))
+ Method->addAttr(A);
+ }
+}
+
/// Check class-level dllimport/dllexport attribute.
void Sema::checkClassLevelDLLAttribute(CXXRecordDecl *Class) {
Attr *ClassAttr = getDLLAttr(Class);
}
checkClassLevelDLLAttribute(Record);
+ checkClassLevelCodeSegAttribute(Record);
bool ClangABICompat4 =
Context.getLangOpts().getClangABICompat() <= LangOptions::ClangABI::Ver4;
}
}
+ // Virtual overrides must have the same code_seg.
+ const auto *OldCSA = Old->getAttr<CodeSegAttr>();
+ const auto *NewCSA = New->getAttr<CodeSegAttr>();
+ if ((NewCSA || OldCSA) &&
+ (!OldCSA || !NewCSA || NewCSA->getName() != OldCSA->getName())) {
+ Diag(New->getLocation(), diag::err_mismatched_code_seg_override);
+ Diag(Old->getLocation(), diag::note_previous_declaration);
+ return true;
+ }
+
CallingConv NewCC = NewFT->getCallConv(), OldCC = OldFT->getCallConv();
// If the calling conventions match, everything is fine
// This represents the function body for the lambda function, check if we
// have to apply optnone due to a pragma.
AddRangeBasedOptnone(Method);
+
+ // code_seg attribute on lambda apply to the method.
+ if (Attr *A = getImplicitCodeSegOrSectionAttrForFunction(Method, /*IsDefinition=*/true))
+ Method->addAttr(A);
// Attributes on the lambda apply to the method.
ProcessDeclAttributes(CurScope, Method, ParamInfo);
--- /dev/null
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm -triple i686-pc-win32 -fms-extensions -verify -o - %s | FileCheck %s
+// expected-no-diagnostics
+
+// Simple case
+
+int __declspec(code_seg("foo_one")) bar_one() { return 1; }
+//CHECK: define {{.*}}bar_one{{.*}} section "foo_one"
+
+// Simple case - explicit attribute used over pragma
+#pragma code_seg("foo_two")
+int __declspec(code_seg("foo_three")) bar2() { return 2; }
+//CHECK: define {{.*}}bar2{{.*}} section "foo_three"
+
+// Check that attribute on one function doesn't affect another
+int another1() { return 1001; }
+//CHECK: define {{.*}}another1{{.*}} section "foo_two"
+
+// Member functions
+
+struct __declspec(code_seg("foo_four")) Foo {
+ int bar3() {return 0;}
+ int bar4();
+ int __declspec(code_seg("foo_six")) bar6() { return 6; }
+ int bar7() { return 7; }
+ struct Inner {
+ int bar5() { return 5; }
+ } z;
+ virtual int baz1() { return 1; }
+};
+
+struct __declspec(code_seg("foo_four")) FooTwo : Foo {
+ int baz1() { return 20; }
+};
+
+int caller1() {
+ Foo f; return f.bar3();
+}
+
+//CHECK: define {{.*}}bar3@Foo{{.*}} section "foo_four"
+int Foo::bar4() { return 4; }
+//CHECK: define {{.*}}bar4@Foo{{.*}} section "foo_four"
+
+#pragma code_seg("someother")
+
+int caller2() {
+ Foo f;
+ Foo *fp = new FooTwo;
+ return f.z.bar5() + f.bar6() + f.bar7() + fp->baz1();
+}
+// MS Compiler and Docs do not match for nested routines
+// Doc says: define {{.*}}bar5@Inner@Foo{{.*}} section "foo_four"
+// Compiler says: define {{.*}}bar5@Inner@Foo{{.*}} section "foo_two"
+// A bug has been reported: see https://reviews.llvm.org/D22931, the
+// Microsoft feedback page is no longer available.
+//CHECK: define {{.*}}bar5@Inner@Foo{{.*}} section "foo_two"
+//CHECK: define {{.*}}bar6@Foo{{.*}} section "foo_six"
+//CHECK: define {{.*}}bar7@Foo{{.*}} section "foo_four"
+// Check that code_seg active at class declaration is not used on member
+// declared outside class when it is not active.
+
+#pragma code_seg(push,"AnotherSeg")
+
+struct FooThree {
+ int bar8();
+ int bar9() { return 9; }
+};
+
+#pragma code_seg(pop)
+
+
+int FooThree::bar8() {return 0;}
+
+int caller3()
+{
+ FooThree f;
+ return f.bar8() + f.bar9();
+}
+
+//CHECK: define {{.*}}bar8@FooThree{{.*}} section "someother"
+//CHECK: define {{.*}}bar9@FooThree{{.*}} section "AnotherSeg"
+
+struct NonTrivialCopy {
+ NonTrivialCopy();
+ NonTrivialCopy(const NonTrivialCopy&);
+ ~NonTrivialCopy();
+};
+
+// check the section for compiler-generated function with declspec.
+
+struct __declspec(code_seg("foo_seven")) FooFour {
+ FooFour() {}
+ int __declspec(code_seg("foo_eight")) bar10(int t) { return t; }
+ NonTrivialCopy f;
+};
+
+//CHECK: define {{.*}}0FooFour@@QAE@ABU0@@Z{{.*}} section "foo_seven"
+// check the section for compiler-generated function with no declspec.
+
+struct FooFive {
+ FooFive() {}
+ int __declspec(code_seg("foo_nine")) bar11(int t) { return t; }
+ NonTrivialCopy f;
+};
+
+//CHECK: define {{.*}}0FooFive@@QAE@ABU0@@Z{{.*}} section "someother"
+
+#pragma code_seg("YetAnother")
+int caller4()
+{
+ FooFour z1;
+ FooFour z2 = z1;
+ FooFive y1;
+ FooFive y2 = y1;
+ return z2.bar10(0) + y2.bar11(1);
+}
+
+//CHECK: define {{.*}}bar10@FooFour{{.*}} section "foo_eight"
+//CHECK: define {{.*}}bar11@FooFive{{.*}} section "foo_nine"
+
+struct FooSix {
+ #pragma code_seg("foo_ten")
+ int bar12() { return 12; }
+ #pragma code_seg("foo_eleven")
+ int bar13() { return 13; }
+};
+
+int bar14() { return 14; }
+//CHECK: define {{.*}}bar14{{.*}} section "foo_eleven"
+
+int caller5()
+{
+ FooSix fsix;
+ return fsix.bar12() + fsix.bar13();
+}
+
+//CHECK: define {{.*}}bar12@FooSix{{.*}} section "foo_ten"
+//CHECK: define {{.*}}bar13@FooSix{{.*}} section "foo_eleven"
+//CHECK: define {{.*}}baz1@FooTwo{{.*}} section "foo_four"
+
--- /dev/null
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm -triple i686-pc-win32 -fms-extensions -verify -o - %s | FileCheck %s
+// expected-no-diagnostics
+// The Microsoft document says: "When this attribute is applied to a class,
+// all member functions of the class and nested classes - this includes
+// compiler-generated special member functions - are put in the specified segment."
+// But the MS compiler does not always follow that. A bug has been reported:
+// see https://reviews.llvm.org/D22931, the Microsoft feedback page is no
+// longer available.
+// The MS compiler will apply a declspec from the parent class if there is no
+// #pragma code_seg active at the class definition. If there is an active
+// code_seg that is used instead.
+
+// No active code_seg
+
+struct __declspec(code_seg("foo_outer")) Foo1 {
+ struct Inner {
+ void bar1();
+ static void bar2();
+ };
+};
+void Foo1::Inner::bar1() {}
+void Foo1::Inner::bar2() {}
+
+//CHECK: define {{.*}}bar1@Inner@Foo1{{.*}} section "foo_outer"
+//CHECK: define {{.*}}bar2@Inner@Foo1{{.*}} section "foo_outer"
+
+struct __declspec(code_seg("foo_outer")) Foo2 {
+ struct __declspec(code_seg("foo_inner")) Inner {
+ void bar1();
+ static void bar2();
+ };
+};
+void Foo2::Inner::bar1() {}
+void Foo2::Inner::bar2() {}
+
+//CHECK: define {{.*}}bar1@Inner@Foo2{{.*}} section "foo_inner"
+//CHECK: define {{.*}}bar2@Inner@Foo2{{.*}} section "foo_inner"
+
+#pragma code_seg(push, "otherseg")
+struct __declspec(code_seg("foo_outer")) Foo3 {
+ struct Inner {
+ void bar1();
+ static void bar2();
+ };
+};
+void Foo3::Inner::bar1() {}
+void Foo3::Inner::bar2() {}
+
+//CHECK: define {{.*}}bar1@Inner@Foo3{{.*}} section "otherseg"
+//CHECK: define {{.*}}bar2@Inner@Foo3{{.*}} section "otherseg"
+
+struct __declspec(code_seg("foo_outer")) Foo4 {
+ struct __declspec(code_seg("foo_inner")) Inner {
+ void bar1();
+ static void bar2();
+ };
+};
+void Foo4::Inner::bar1() {}
+void Foo4::Inner::bar2() {}
+
+//CHECK: define {{.*}}bar1@Inner@Foo4{{.*}} section "foo_inner"
+//CHECK: define {{.*}}bar2@Inner@Foo4{{.*}} section "foo_inner"
+
+#pragma code_seg(pop)
+// Back to no active pragma
+struct __declspec(code_seg("foo_outer")) Foo5 {
+ struct Inner {
+ void bar1();
+ static void bar2();
+ struct __declspec(code_seg("inner1_seg")) Inner1 {
+ struct Inner2 {
+ void bar1();
+ static void bar2();
+ };
+ };
+ };
+};
+void Foo5::Inner::bar1() {}
+void Foo5::Inner::bar2() {}
+void Foo5::Inner::Inner1::Inner2::bar1() {}
+void Foo5::Inner::Inner1::Inner2::bar2() {}
+
+//CHECK: define {{.*}}bar1@Inner@Foo5{{.*}} section "foo_outer"
+//CHECK: define {{.*}}bar2@Inner@Foo5{{.*}} section "foo_outer"
+//CHECK: define {{.*}}bar1@Inner2@Inner1@Inner@Foo5{{.*}} section "inner1_seg"
+//CHECK: define {{.*}}bar2@Inner2@Inner1@Inner@Foo5{{.*}} section "inner1_seg"
+
--- /dev/null
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm -triple i686-pc-win32 -std=c++11 -fms-extensions -verify -o - %s | FileCheck %s
+// expected-no-diagnostics
+
+// Class member templates
+
+#pragma code_seg(push, "something")
+
+template <typename T>
+struct __declspec(code_seg("foo_one")) ClassOne {
+ int bar1(T t) { return int(t); }
+ int bar2(T t);
+ int bar3(T t);
+};
+
+template <typename T>
+int ClassOne<T>::bar2(T t) {
+ return int(t);
+}
+
+int caller1() {
+ ClassOne<int> coi;
+ return coi.bar1(6) + coi.bar2(3);
+}
+
+//CHECK: define {{.*}}bar1@?$ClassOne{{.*}} section "foo_one"
+//CHECK: define {{.*}}bar2@?$ClassOne{{.*}} section "foo_one"
+
+
+template <typename T>
+struct ClassTwo {
+ int bar11(T t) { return int(t); }
+ int bar22(T t);
+ int bar33(T t);
+};
+
+#pragma code_seg("newone")
+
+template <typename T>
+int ClassTwo<T>::bar22(T t) {
+ return int(t);
+}
+
+#pragma code_seg("someother")
+
+template <typename T>
+int ClassTwo<T>::bar33(T t) {
+ return int(t);
+}
+
+#pragma code_seg("yetanother")
+
+int caller2() {
+ ClassTwo<int> coi;
+ return coi.bar11(6) + coi.bar22(3) + coi.bar33(44);
+}
+
+//CHECK: define {{.*}}bar11@?$ClassTwo{{.*}} section "something"
+//CHECK: define {{.*}}bar22@?$ClassTwo{{.*}} section "newone"
+//CHECK: define {{.*}}bar33@?$ClassTwo{{.*}} section "someother"
+
+template<>
+struct ClassOne<double>
+{
+ int bar44(double d) { return 1; }
+};
+template<>
+struct __declspec(code_seg("foo_three")) ClassOne<long>
+{
+ int bar55(long d) { return 1; }
+};
+
+#pragma code_seg("onemore")
+int caller3() {
+ ClassOne<double> d;
+ ClassOne<long> l;
+ return d.bar44(1.0)+l.bar55(1);
+}
+
+//CHECK: define {{.*}}bar44{{.*}} section "yetanother"
+//CHECK: define {{.*}}bar55{{.*}} section "foo_three"
+
+
+// Function templates
+template <typename T>
+int __declspec(code_seg("foo_four")) bar66(T t) { return int(t); }
+
+// specializations do not take the segment from primary
+template<>
+int bar66(int i) { return 0; }
+
+#pragma code_seg(pop)
+
+template<>
+int bar66(char c) { return 0; }
+
+struct A1 {int i;};
+template<>
+int __declspec(code_seg("foo_five")) bar66(A1 a) { return a.i; }
+
+int caller4()
+{
+// but instantiations do use the section from the primary
+return bar66(0) + bar66(1.0) + bar66('c');
+}
+//CHECK: define {{.*}}bar66@H{{.*}} section "onemore"
+//CHECK-NOT: define {{.*}}bar66@D{{.*}} section
+//CHECK: define {{.*}}bar66@UA1{{.*}} section "foo_five"
+//CHECK: define {{.*}}bar66@N{{.*}} section "foo_four"
+
+
+
--- /dev/null
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -fms-extensions %s -triple x86_64-pc-win32
+// expected-no-diagnostics
+
+// Non-Member Function Overloading is involved
+
+int __declspec(code_seg("foo_one")) bar_one(int) { return 1; }
+//CHECK: define {{.*}}bar_one{{.*}} section "foo_one"
+int __declspec(code_seg("foo_two")) bar_one(int,float) { return 11; }
+//CHECK: define {{.*}}bar_one{{.*}} section "foo_two"
+int __declspec(code_seg("foo_three")) bar_one(float) { return 12; }
+//CHECK: define {{.*}}bar_one{{.*}} section "foo_three"
+
+// virtual function overloading is involved
+
+struct __declspec(code_seg("my_one")) Base3 {
+ virtual int barA(int) { return 1; }
+ virtual int barA(int,float) { return 2; }
+ virtual int barA(float) { return 3; }
+
+ virtual void __declspec(code_seg("my_two")) barB(int) { }
+ virtual void __declspec(code_seg("my_three")) barB(float) { }
+ virtual void __declspec(code_seg("my_four")) barB(int, float) { }
+
+};
+
+//CHECK: define {{.*}}barA@Base3{{.*}} section "my_one"
+//CHECK: define {{.*}}barA@Base3{{.*}} section "my_one"
+//CHECK: define {{.*}}barA@Base3{{.*}} section "my_one"
+//CHECK: define {{.*}}barB@Base3{{.*}} section "my_two"
+//CHECK: define {{.*}}barB@Base3{{.*}} section "my_three"
+//CHECK: define {{.*}}barB@Base3{{.*}} section "my_four"
+
+#pragma code_seg("another")
+// Member functions
+struct __declspec(code_seg("foo_four")) Foo {
+ int bar3() {return 0;}
+ __declspec(code_seg("foo_lala")) int bar4() {return 0;} }; int caller() {Foo f; return f.bar3() + f.bar4(); }
+
+//CHECK: define {{.*}}bar3@Foo{{.*}} section "foo_four"
+//CHECK: define {{.*}}bar4@Foo{{.*}} section "foo_lala"
+
+// Lambdas
+#pragma code_seg("something")
+
+int __declspec(code_seg("foo")) bar1()
+{
+ int lala = 4;
+ auto l = [=](int i) { return i+4; };
+ return l(-4);
+}
+
+//CHECK: define {{.*}}bar1{{.*}} section "foo"
+//CHECK: define {{.*}}lambda{{.*}}bar1{{.*}} section "something"
+
+double __declspec(code_seg("foo")) bar2()
+{
+ double lala = 4.0;
+ auto l = [=](double d) __declspec(code_seg("another")) { return d+4.0; };
+ return l(4.0);
+}
+
+//CHECK: define {{.*}}bar2{{.*}} section "foo"
+//CHECK: define {{.*}}lambda{{.*}}bar2{{.*}} section "another"
+
+
--- /dev/null
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -fms-extensions %s -triple x86_64-pc-win32
+
+struct __declspec(code_seg("my_one")) FooOne {
+ int barC();
+};
+
+struct FooTwo {
+ int __declspec(code_seg("my_three")) barD();
+ int barE();
+};
+int __declspec(code_seg("my_four")) FooOne::barC() { return 10; }
+// expected-warning@-1 {{codeseg does not match previous declaration}}
+// expected-note@3{{previous attribute is here}}
+int __declspec(code_seg("my_five")) FooTwo::barD() { return 20; }
+// expected-warning@-1 {{codeseg does not match previous declaration}}
+// expected-note@8 {{previous attribute is here}}
+int __declspec(code_seg("my_six")) FooTwo::barE() { return 30; }
+// expected-warning@-1 {{codeseg does not match previous declaration}}
+// expected-note@9 {{previous declaration is here}}
+
+// Microsoft docs say:
+// If a base-class has a code_seg attribute, derived classes must have the
+// same attribute.
+struct __declspec(code_seg("my_base")) Base1 {};
+struct Base2 {};
+
+struct D1 : Base1 {};
+//expected-error@-1 {{derived class must specify the same code segment as its base classes}}
+// expected-note@24 {{base class 'Base1' specified here}}
+struct __declspec(code_seg("my_derived")) D2 : Base1 {};
+// expected-error@-1 {{derived class must specify the same code segment as its base classes}}
+// expected-note@24 {{base class 'Base1' specified here}}
+struct __declspec(code_seg("my_derived")) D3 : Base2 {};
+// expected-error@-1 {{derived class must specify the same code segment as its base classes}}
+// expected-note@25 {{base class 'Base2' specified here}}
+
+template <typename T> struct __declspec(code_seg("my_base")) MB : T { };
+template <typename T> struct __declspec(code_seg("my_derived")) MD : T { };
+MB<Base1> mb1; // ok
+MB<Base2> mb2;
+// expected-error@37 {{derived class must specify the same code segment as its base classes}}
+// expected-note@-2 {{in instantiation of template class}}
+// expected-note@25 {{base class 'Base2' specified here}}
+MD<Base1> md1;
+// expected-error@38 {{derived class must specify the same code segment as its base classes}}
+// expected-note@-2 {{in instantiation of template class}}
+// expected-note@24 {{base class 'Base1' specified here}}
+MD<Base2> md2;
+// expected-error@38 {{derived class must specify the same code segment as its base classes}}
+// expected-note@-2 {{in instantiation of template class}}
+// expected-note@25 {{base class 'Base2' specified here}}
+
+// Virtual overrides must have the same code_seg.
+struct __declspec(code_seg("my_one")) Base3 {
+ virtual int barA() { return 1; }
+ virtual int __declspec(code_seg("my_two")) barB() { return 2; }
+};
+struct __declspec(code_seg("my_one")) Derived3 : Base3 {
+ int barA() { return 4; } // ok
+ int barB() { return 6; }
+ // expected-error@-1 {{overriding virtual function must specify the same code segment as its overridden function}}
+ // expected-note@56 {{previous declaration is here}}
+};
+
+struct Base4 {
+ virtual int __declspec(code_seg("my_one")) barA() {return 1;}
+ virtual int barB() { return 2;}
+};
+struct Derived4 : Base4 {
+ virtual int barA() {return 1;}
+ // expected-error@-1 {{overriding virtual function must specify the same code segment as its overridden function}}
+ // expected-note@66 {{previous declaration is here}}
+ virtual int __declspec(code_seg("my_two")) barB() {return 1;}
+ // expected-error@-1 {{overriding virtual function must specify the same code segment as its overridden function}}
+ // expected-note@67 {{previous declaration is here}}
+};
+
+// MS gives an error when different code segments are used but a warning when a duplicate is used
+
+// Function
+int __declspec(code_seg("foo")) __declspec(code_seg("foo")) bar1() { return 1; }
+// expected-warning@-1 {{duplicate code segment specifiers}}
+int __declspec(code_seg("foo")) __declspec(code_seg("bar")) bar2() { return 1; }
+// expected-error@-1 {{conflicting code segment specifiers}}
+
+// Class
+struct __declspec(code_seg("foo")) __declspec(code_seg("foo")) Foo {
+ // expected-warning@-1 {{duplicate code segment specifiers}}
+ int bar3() {return 0;}
+};
+struct __declspec(code_seg("foo")) __declspec(code_seg("bar")) FooSix {
+ // expected-error@-1 {{conflicting code segment specifiers}}
+ int bar3() {return 0;}
+};
+
+//Class Members
+struct FooThree {
+ int __declspec(code_seg("foo")) __declspec(code_seg("foo")) bar1() { return 1; }
+ // expected-warning@-1 {{duplicate code segment specifiers}}
+ int __declspec(code_seg("foo")) __declspec(code_seg("bar")) bar2() { return 1; }
+ // expected-error@-1 {{conflicting code segment specifiers}}
+ int bar8();
+ int bar9() { return 9; }
+};
+
--- /dev/null
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -fms-extensions %s -triple x86_64-pc-win32
+
+// Multiple inheritance is involved (code segmments all disagree between the bases and derived class)
+struct __declspec(code_seg("my_base")) Base1 {};
+struct Base2 {};
+
+struct D1 : Base1, Base2 {};
+// expected-error@-1 {{derived class must specify the same code segment as its base classes}}
+// expected-note@4 {{base class 'Base1' specified here}}
+
+struct __declspec(code_seg("my_derived")) D2 : Base2, Base1 {};
+// expected-error@-1 {{derived class must specify the same code segment as its base classes}}
+// expected-error@-2 {{derived class must specify the same code segment as its base classes}}
+// expected-note@5 {{base class 'Base2' specified here}}
+// expected-note@4 {{base class 'Base1' specified here}}
+
+// Multiple inheritance (code segments partially agree between the bases and the derived class)
+struct __declspec(code_seg("base_class")) BaseClass1 {};
+struct __declspec(code_seg("base_class")) BaseClass2 {};
+
+struct Derived1 : BaseClass1, BaseClass2 {};
+// expected-error@-1 {{derived class must specify the same code segment as its base classes}}
+// expected-error@-2 {{derived class must specify the same code segment as its base classes}}
+// expected-note@18 {{base class 'BaseClass1' specified here}}
+// expected-note@19 {{base class 'BaseClass2' specified here}}
+
+struct __declspec(code_seg("derived_class")) Derived2 : BaseClass2, BaseClass1 {};
+// expected-error@-1 {{derived class must specify the same code segment as its base classes}}
+// expected-error@-2 {{derived class must specify the same code segment as its base classes}}
+// expected-note@19 {{base class 'BaseClass2' specified here}}
+// expected-note@18 {{base class 'BaseClass1' specified here}}
+
+struct __declspec(code_seg("base_class")) Derived3 : BaseClass2, BaseClass1 {}; //OK
+struct __declspec(code_seg("base_class")) Derived4 : BaseClass1, BaseClass2 {}; //OK
+
+// Multiple inheritance is involved (code segmments all agree between the bases and derived class)
+struct __declspec(code_seg("foo_base")) B1 {};
+struct __declspec(code_seg("foo_base")) B2 {};
+struct __declspec(code_seg("foo_base")) Derived : B1, B2 {};
+
+// virtual Inheritance is involved (code segmments all disagree between the bases and derived class)
+struct __declspec(code_seg("my_one")) Base {
+ virtual int barA() { return 1; } ;
+};
+
+struct __declspec(code_seg("my_two")) Derived5 : virtual Base {
+ virtual int barB() { return 2; };
+};
+// expected-error@-3 {{derived class must specify the same code segment as its base classes}}
+// expected-note@42 {{base class 'Base' specified here}}
+
+struct __declspec(code_seg("my_three")) Derived6 : virtual Base {
+ virtual int barC() { return 3; };
+};
+// expected-error@-3 {{derived class must specify the same code segment as its base classes}}
+// expected-note@42 {{base class 'Base' specified here}}
+
+struct __declspec(code_seg("my_four")) Derived7 : Derived5, Derived6 {};
+// expected-error@-1 {{derived class must specify the same code segment as its base classes}}
+// expected-error@-2 {{derived class must specify the same code segment as its base classes}}
+// expected-note@46 {{base class 'Derived5' specified here}}
+// expected-note@52 {{base class 'Derived6' specified here}}
+
+// virtual Inheritance is involved (code segmments partially agree between the bases and derived class)
+struct __declspec(code_seg("my_class")) BaseClass {
+ virtual int barA() { return 1; } ;
+};
+
+struct __declspec(code_seg("my_class")) DerivedClass1 : virtual BaseClass { //OK
+ virtual int barB() { return 2; };
+};
+
+struct __declspec(code_seg("my_class")) DerivedClass2 : virtual BaseClass { //OK
+ virtual int barC() { return 3; };
+};
+
+struct __declspec(code_seg("my_derived_one")) DerivedClass3 : DerivedClass1, DerivedClass2 {};
+// expected-error@-1 {{derived class must specify the same code segment as its base classes}}
+// expected-error@-2 {{derived class must specify the same code segment as its base classes}}
+// expected-note@69 {{base class 'DerivedClass1' specified here}}
+// expected-note@73 {{base class 'DerivedClass2' specified here}}
+
+// virtual Inheritance is involved (code segmments all agree between the bases and derived class)
+struct __declspec(code_seg("foo_one")) Class {
+ virtual int foo1() { return 10; } ;
+};
+
+struct __declspec(code_seg("foo_one")) Derived_One: virtual Class { //OK
+ virtual int foo2() { return 20; };
+};
+
+struct __declspec(code_seg("foo_one")) Derived_Two : virtual Class { //OK
+ virtual int foo3() { return 30; };
+};
+
+struct __declspec(code_seg("foo_one")) Derived_Three : Derived_One, Derived_Two {}; //OK
+
projects / platform / upstream / llvm.git / commitdiff