i40evf: remove needless min_t() on num_online_cpus()*2

We already set pairs to the value of adapter->num_active_queues. This
value is limited by vsi_res->num_queue_pairs and num_online_cpus(). This
means that pairs by definition is already smaller than
num_online_cpus()*2, so we don't even need to bother with this check.

Lets just remove it and update the comment.

Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Tested-by: Andrew Bowers <andrewx.bowers@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40evf/i40evf_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40evf/i40evf_main.c
index 8e6276d..89035ee 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40evf/i40evf_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40evf/i40evf_main.c
@@ -1271,13 +1271,13 @@ static int i40evf_set_interrupt_capability(struct i40evf_adapter *adapter)
        }
        pairs = adapter->num_active_queues;
 
-       /* It's easy to be greedy for MSI-X vectors, but it really
-        * doesn't do us much good if we have a lot more vectors
-        * than CPU's.  So let's be conservative and only ask for
-        * (roughly) twice the number of vectors as there are CPU's.
+       /* It's easy to be greedy for MSI-X vectors, but it really doesn't do
+        * us much good if we have more vectors than CPUs. However, we already
+        * limit the total number of queues by the number of CPUs so we do not
+        * need any further limiting here.
         */
-       v_budget = min_t(int, pairs, (int)(num_online_cpus() * 2)) + NONQ_VECS;
-       v_budget = min_t(int, v_budget, (int)adapter->vf_res->max_vectors);
+       v_budget = min_t(int, pairs + NONQ_VECS,
+                        (int)adapter->vf_res->max_vectors);
 
        adapter->msix_entries = kcalloc(v_budget,
                                        sizeof(struct msix_entry), GFP_KERNEL);