Currently we explicitly check for the first subflow being
NULL in a couple of places, even if we don't need any
special actions in such scenario.
Just drop the unneeded checks, to avoid confusion.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
* should match. If they mismatch, the peer is misbehaving and
* we will prefer the most recent information.
*/
- if (READ_ONCE(msk->rcv_data_fin) || !READ_ONCE(msk->first))
+ if (READ_ONCE(msk->rcv_data_fin))
return false;
WRITE_ONCE(msk->rcv_data_fin_seq,
u64 rcv_data_fin_seq;
bool ret = false;
- if (__mptcp_check_fallback(msk) || !msk->first)
+ if (__mptcp_check_fallback(msk))
return ret;
/* Need to ack a DATA_FIN received from a peer while this side