block: add back the bd_holder_dir reference in bd_link_disk_holder

This essentially reverts "block: remove the extra kobject reference in
bd_link_disk_holder".  That commit dropped the extra reference because
the condition in the comment can't be true.  But it turns out that
comment did not actually describe the problematic situation, so add
back the extra reference and document it properly.

Fixes: fbd9a39542ec ("block: remove the extra kobject reference in bd_link_disk_holder")
Reported-by: Tushar Sugandhi <tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

diff --git a/block/holder.c b/block/holder.c
index 4568cc4f68276f4e9e0d245c4014d499a770c00b..9dc084182337f87dbe41b49b2652c06ee851abde 100644 (file)
--- a/block/holder.c
+++ b/block/holder.c
@@ -106,6 +106,12 @@ int bd_link_disk_holder(struct block_device *bdev, struct gendisk *disk)
        }
 
        list_add(&holder->list, &disk->slave_bdevs);
+       /*
+        * del_gendisk drops the initial reference to bd_holder_dir, so we need
+        * to keep our own here to allow for cleanup past that point.
+        */
+       kobject_get(bdev->bd_holder_dir);
+
 out_unlock:
        mutex_unlock(&disk->open_mutex);
        return ret;
@@ -138,6 +144,7 @@ void bd_unlink_disk_holder(struct block_device *bdev, struct gendisk *disk)
        if (!WARN_ON_ONCE(holder == NULL) && !--holder->refcnt) {
                if (disk->slave_dir)
                        __unlink_disk_holder(bdev, disk);
+               kobject_put(bdev->bd_holder_dir);
                list_del_init(&holder->list);
                kfree(holder);
        }